Thousands dead in Iraq. Thousands dead in Afghanistan. Thousands dead in Palestine. Thousands dead in Syria. Thousands dead in Libya. Thousands dead in Egypt.
And that's just what the US is responsible for in the past few years.
Oops! But what's this?! One Australian baseball player dead in Oklahoma and America is SHOCKED?! (that's what Drudge says, and he runs the world, right?)
Yup, once again Americans have their heads so far up their shoots that they are shocked by one senseless murder, but not thousands (bordering on millions really). Yup, America's hand-picked assassins across North Africa and the Middle East are slaughtering dozens of folks a day, but don't let that SHOCK you. No siree...be sure and focus all your attention on one senseless murder in Oklahoma. That's the important story.
Not only does this story show up the tremendous hypocrisy and ignorance of the American people (except you...you're smart because you read this column), but it is such an obvious psy-op that even my dense brain can see through it.
This whole thing -- likely the set up, but especially the media coverage -- is nothing more than the photographic opposite of Trayvon Martin. This is a Balkanization operation. Keep the worthless, ignorant worms fighting each other and they will forget to focus on the Big Picture. Keep the blacks and whites at each other, keep both of them fighting the Mexicans, and keep all of them hating the Jews because that furthers the Zionist agenda in the Middle East.
If I weren't so damn angry, I'd be humming the old Tom Lehrer tune, "National Brotherhood Week." Why am I angry? Because Americans are so used and they can't see past the fuzz in their navels to get it. As a nation and people, Americans are shocked that a group of kids would randomly kill someone when their leaders randomly kill millions annually and no one cares.
You see, I remember the 60s, when college students were being mowed down by National Guardsmen because they dared to question the war culture of America. I remember when Richard Nixon got in trouble for carpet-bombing neutral countries like Cambodia and Laos. Now Obama can order drone bombings worldwide in any nation and nobody pays attention...until a couple of kids shoot a random gthere's uy in a random neighborhood in a random place like Oklahoma.
Oh sure, Americans are shocked by Sandy Hook, but a drone attack on a wedding party gets complete apathy. Aurora? Now there's a shocker. But soldiers doing the same thing in Bagdad? Yawn. To an American, the only world they can see is their backyard and the only death they register is their neighbor. All the horrors committed by their sons and daughters in their name in countries whose names they can't pronounce in places they can't find on a map are meaningless. Such empty souls.
We won't even go into the part about America not having fought a 'legal' war since WW2 without a peep from the American people, nor especially those in uniform sworn to protect and defend the Constitution. Obviously, they are defending a piece of paper and not the rules and regulations within it.
Yes, America, you are shocked by a wealthy athlete being gunned down by a bunch of bored kids, but no one will feel the least twinge of conscience for having contributed to a culture of casual death and illegal war and useless government schools and empty, idle youth. No one will feel guilty for having let their society go down the tubes. No one will feel the least bit responsible for having pissed away the chance to make things different.
Quick, write a letter to your Congresscritter to complain about the senseless violence. Grouse with your buddies over a happy-hour beer about how "this here country is goin' to Hell". If you're feeling really energetic, sign a petition that you haven't read to demand that guns be confiscated, forgetting that it is bored, amoral kids that kill, not guns.
Yes, America! Be SHOCKED! Then completely ignore the real problems and jump up and down about emotional hot buttons that the media manipulate on behalf of your masters. Pretend that it's not your fault, but that of a bunch of unaccountable bureaucrats that you thought were doing something about these problems so you can sit on your fat ass in front of the TeeVee.
Be SHOCKED! America. Not because a bunch of empty, asnine youths randomly killed a man on the street. Be shocked that you haven't done anything all your life to stop the death culture of which you are a part. Be shocked that it has gotten so far out of hand and you haven't sobered up and wiped the drool off your lips long enough to notice.
That's right America, you are just as guilty as those kids. You have pulled the trigger or driven the get-away car or written your IRS check. One way of the other, there is so much blood on your hands that to be shocked by the murder of a random guy in a random neighborhood in random Oklahoma is just plain hypocritical. There's no other way out of this one.
Don't blame the guns, or the laws, or the schools. Walk straight over to the mirror and look into the eyes of the guilty party. There's no escaping this one.
In fact, America, the whole world is shocked. We're shocked that you are shocked at the chickens coming home to roost.
Here Thar Be Monsters!
From the other side of the argument to the other side of the planet, read in over 149 countries and 17 languages. We bring you news and opinion with an IndoTex® flavor. Be sure to check out the Home Site. Send thoughts and comments to bernard atradiofarside.com, and tell all your friends. Note comments on this site are moderated to remove spam. Sampai jumpa, y'all.
Showing posts with label Afghanistan. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Afghanistan. Show all posts
22.8.13
12.11.12
Simple Questions, Complex Answers
One of our long-term readers and correspondents, LK, has done it again by sending a huge, loaded question using their regular economy of words:
Let's dispose of the Petaeus case first. In case you've been under a rock for the past decade, and a lot of folks are, David Petraeus was the US general sent into Afghanistan to oversee the "Quiet Surge" against Afghan "Taliban warlords and strongmen", and prevent the Anglo-American Empire from becoming yet another victim in the long line of historic empires who met their doom in that land.
Forget for a moment that under the Soviet occupation of Afghanistan in the 80s, it was known as "military escalation" against "Taliban freedom fighters". See Tom Hanks in "Charlie Wilson's War".
In a desperate attempt to keep the American public on track with the war effort, Petaeus was built up into a military genius and his "Surge" was considered highly successful, though facts tend to disagree. As a reward, Petraeus was handed the reins of the CIA, figuring he'd be a compliant sort, lest the PTB take away his glorious mantle.
Well, it seems that Petraeus knows a great deal about the events in Benghazi and the death of the Libyan ambassador there. So much, in fact, that he was called to testify before Congress. My guess, and this is a good bet, was that he stated to his handlers unequivocally that he wouldn't lie under oath. This wouldn't do, since it would undermine the five or six officious versions of those events and even lead to Obama being brought up on criminal charges before Congress (often called impeachment).
For damage control, Petraeus was pushed...er, fell on his sword to bury a few big skeletons in the US closet. We can assume this since having an extra-marital affair is about as unusual in Washington as cockroaches in a New York brownstone. Hell, if Bill Clinton could get away with leaving "DNA evidence" on Monica Lewinsky's blue dress, not to mention JFK's dalliances, we can easily assume much deeper motives in this case.
Of course, this is all speculative, but history and the evidence presents a strong argument.
Now, as for the larger question of disassembling the military, we will have to climb a bit further out on the limb of speculation, but I believe the cumulative events of the past 20 years will support the weight.
First of all, we must define current events. There are basically two major groups vying for world domination. One is the Socialists (often called communists, which is a gross misnomer), and the other is called the Fascists. The Socialists envision the world dominated by the State and operated by a central steering committee. The Fascists see the world dominated by corporate interests and run by a Board of Directors. The central goal is the same, this is only an argument over who's heel the world will be squashed under, and how it will be done.
In the US, these interests are represented by the Democratic and Republican parties respectively. In other countries, they have different names, but in nearly every case, there are two dominant parties who simply trade reins back and forth in things euphemistically called 'elections'. The Socialists want to unwind the military and middle classes of strong Fascist economies in order to subject everything to the States. The Fascists want to build up the militaries and middle classes in order to prosecute their wars of domination over Socialist strongholds.
The Socialist faction is centered around Russia, China and parts of Europe, while the Fascist segment is headquartered in the US and UK. The recent US elections were a victory for the Socialists, which is why the corporate media and business interests are wringing their hands. The firing of Petraeus and other efforts to undermine the US military are also related to the Socialist efforts to bring the corporate war machine to heel. By discrediting Fascist military leaders, the Socialists can advance their people into key positions, and with Obama being a lame-duck president, he is free now to begin the pogrom in earnest, having fooled enough of the population into supporting him.
The Socialists have also gone out of their way to undermine the middle classes of the US and Europe. The Socialists want something similar to Orwell's dystopia in "Nineteen Eighty-Four", while the Fascists envision a strong middle class controlled by creature comforts and gee-gaws. In actuality, we are seeing a sort of amalgam emerging globally, with the growth of Asia's and the subversion of the West's middle classes. In effect, the independent Fascist middle classes must be brought to heel, while the cowed populations of Socialist states can be allowed to enjoy some rewards in order to keep them tied to the wheel of state.
In order to create the fusion of Socio-Fascism, the US/UK military might must be crushed and a new leadership with more compliant and less nationalistic allegiances must be installed.
Given the growth of Asian middle classes and the soon to be complete destruction of Western middle classes, plus the balancing of military strength across the planet, that some kind of truce has been made at the highest levels of global domination, with a fusion of the two competing economic and political systems being the consensus outcome. Eventually, probably sooner than later, an equilibrium will be struck globally with power being shared between corporate and state interests.
Whether this will be a successful marriage of opposites (not complete since they share the same overarching goal) remains to be seen. Certainly, the masses seem content when they have disposable income, TeeVees and little blinky lights in a box to distract them. However, there seems to be a need on the part of the PTB to completely expunge the independent spirit still flickering in certain Western cultures. Those people must be completely dismembered and rebuilt in the image of the PTB.
For their part, the PTB seem to have come to a consensus. The Socialists see the value of creature comforts and hypnotic toys in keeping the masses controlled, while the Fascists have witnessed the value of forced production and consumption. And certainly both sides are happy with the re-election of Obama and the fall of Petraeus, since it advances the goal of subduing the West into the global empire. The Obamacare tax beginning next year will be the final nail in that coffin.
On the other side is a small but growing number of people who realize that slavery is slavery, whether the chains are gold or steel. There is a definite war going on with the Socio-Fascists on one side and the free humans on the other. The Ron Paul campaign exposed a great number of them, and that may in fact have been the purpose of allowing Ron Paul to be as successful as he was, whether or not Paul was aware of it (and I haven't decided which yet).
The free thinkers have been drawn into the open now. Their positions and strongholds have been revealed. If you perceive the PTB being a little cockier and more at ease, this is why. The final battle for global domination can begin in earnest now, since all sides and see each other clearly. The problem is that most free thinkers don't know what they've done yet. People like Assange and Paul have smoked out the resistace and the PTB can target them at last.
Where is all this leading? Well, that is entirely up to you, dear reader. First, you must decide if you are a Socio-Fascist or free thinker. Then you must determine what defensive and offensive positions you will assume. Finally, you must take positive action to join one side or the other. The time for fence-sitting is finally past and the Big Showdown is at hand. The only weapon the free thinkers have is creativity and culture. The PTB have shown their modus operandi over the past 500 years. It only requires a commitment to study on your part to get up to speed.
As usual, LK has opened a large can of worms with a simple question. The answer requires every non-zombie to face the decision of what price they are willing to pay for "peace and security". The evidence and strategy are plain enough to support this speculation.
So, which is it? The freedom to choose your own path? Or the security of having it chosen for you? The former will require you to leave everything behind, while the latter will see everything taken from you by force. By 'everything' I mean dignity and self-achievement, not toys and gee-gaws.
Petraeus served his masters well, and we see the price of his loyalty.
As for me, give me liberty or give me death.
==================================
This just in from another long-time reader, correspondent and benefactor of our efforts...
As for the durian, I know just what you mean. And that brings up another simple question. Who was the first person to look at a football-sized fruit with lethal spines all over it that smelled like month-old gym socks stuffed with rotten onions and contained yellow, slimy worm-like fruit and think, "Hey, that looks good to eat!"
"What is your take on the military and CIA and how O is getting rid of them?"I could take the easy route out of this one and say that Obama is paving the way for the Anticrhrist, and I'd have backup, but I'll resist the temptation and delve a bit deeper into this issue.
Let's dispose of the Petaeus case first. In case you've been under a rock for the past decade, and a lot of folks are, David Petraeus was the US general sent into Afghanistan to oversee the "Quiet Surge" against Afghan "Taliban warlords and strongmen", and prevent the Anglo-American Empire from becoming yet another victim in the long line of historic empires who met their doom in that land.
Forget for a moment that under the Soviet occupation of Afghanistan in the 80s, it was known as "military escalation" against "Taliban freedom fighters". See Tom Hanks in "Charlie Wilson's War".
In a desperate attempt to keep the American public on track with the war effort, Petaeus was built up into a military genius and his "Surge" was considered highly successful, though facts tend to disagree. As a reward, Petraeus was handed the reins of the CIA, figuring he'd be a compliant sort, lest the PTB take away his glorious mantle.
Well, it seems that Petraeus knows a great deal about the events in Benghazi and the death of the Libyan ambassador there. So much, in fact, that he was called to testify before Congress. My guess, and this is a good bet, was that he stated to his handlers unequivocally that he wouldn't lie under oath. This wouldn't do, since it would undermine the five or six officious versions of those events and even lead to Obama being brought up on criminal charges before Congress (often called impeachment).
For damage control, Petraeus was pushed...er, fell on his sword to bury a few big skeletons in the US closet. We can assume this since having an extra-marital affair is about as unusual in Washington as cockroaches in a New York brownstone. Hell, if Bill Clinton could get away with leaving "DNA evidence" on Monica Lewinsky's blue dress, not to mention JFK's dalliances, we can easily assume much deeper motives in this case.
Of course, this is all speculative, but history and the evidence presents a strong argument.
Now, as for the larger question of disassembling the military, we will have to climb a bit further out on the limb of speculation, but I believe the cumulative events of the past 20 years will support the weight.
First of all, we must define current events. There are basically two major groups vying for world domination. One is the Socialists (often called communists, which is a gross misnomer), and the other is called the Fascists. The Socialists envision the world dominated by the State and operated by a central steering committee. The Fascists see the world dominated by corporate interests and run by a Board of Directors. The central goal is the same, this is only an argument over who's heel the world will be squashed under, and how it will be done.
In the US, these interests are represented by the Democratic and Republican parties respectively. In other countries, they have different names, but in nearly every case, there are two dominant parties who simply trade reins back and forth in things euphemistically called 'elections'. The Socialists want to unwind the military and middle classes of strong Fascist economies in order to subject everything to the States. The Fascists want to build up the militaries and middle classes in order to prosecute their wars of domination over Socialist strongholds.
The Socialist faction is centered around Russia, China and parts of Europe, while the Fascist segment is headquartered in the US and UK. The recent US elections were a victory for the Socialists, which is why the corporate media and business interests are wringing their hands. The firing of Petraeus and other efforts to undermine the US military are also related to the Socialist efforts to bring the corporate war machine to heel. By discrediting Fascist military leaders, the Socialists can advance their people into key positions, and with Obama being a lame-duck president, he is free now to begin the pogrom in earnest, having fooled enough of the population into supporting him.
The Socialists have also gone out of their way to undermine the middle classes of the US and Europe. The Socialists want something similar to Orwell's dystopia in "Nineteen Eighty-Four", while the Fascists envision a strong middle class controlled by creature comforts and gee-gaws. In actuality, we are seeing a sort of amalgam emerging globally, with the growth of Asia's and the subversion of the West's middle classes. In effect, the independent Fascist middle classes must be brought to heel, while the cowed populations of Socialist states can be allowed to enjoy some rewards in order to keep them tied to the wheel of state.
In order to create the fusion of Socio-Fascism, the US/UK military might must be crushed and a new leadership with more compliant and less nationalistic allegiances must be installed.
Given the growth of Asian middle classes and the soon to be complete destruction of Western middle classes, plus the balancing of military strength across the planet, that some kind of truce has been made at the highest levels of global domination, with a fusion of the two competing economic and political systems being the consensus outcome. Eventually, probably sooner than later, an equilibrium will be struck globally with power being shared between corporate and state interests.
Whether this will be a successful marriage of opposites (not complete since they share the same overarching goal) remains to be seen. Certainly, the masses seem content when they have disposable income, TeeVees and little blinky lights in a box to distract them. However, there seems to be a need on the part of the PTB to completely expunge the independent spirit still flickering in certain Western cultures. Those people must be completely dismembered and rebuilt in the image of the PTB.
For their part, the PTB seem to have come to a consensus. The Socialists see the value of creature comforts and hypnotic toys in keeping the masses controlled, while the Fascists have witnessed the value of forced production and consumption. And certainly both sides are happy with the re-election of Obama and the fall of Petraeus, since it advances the goal of subduing the West into the global empire. The Obamacare tax beginning next year will be the final nail in that coffin.
On the other side is a small but growing number of people who realize that slavery is slavery, whether the chains are gold or steel. There is a definite war going on with the Socio-Fascists on one side and the free humans on the other. The Ron Paul campaign exposed a great number of them, and that may in fact have been the purpose of allowing Ron Paul to be as successful as he was, whether or not Paul was aware of it (and I haven't decided which yet).
The free thinkers have been drawn into the open now. Their positions and strongholds have been revealed. If you perceive the PTB being a little cockier and more at ease, this is why. The final battle for global domination can begin in earnest now, since all sides and see each other clearly. The problem is that most free thinkers don't know what they've done yet. People like Assange and Paul have smoked out the resistace and the PTB can target them at last.
Where is all this leading? Well, that is entirely up to you, dear reader. First, you must decide if you are a Socio-Fascist or free thinker. Then you must determine what defensive and offensive positions you will assume. Finally, you must take positive action to join one side or the other. The time for fence-sitting is finally past and the Big Showdown is at hand. The only weapon the free thinkers have is creativity and culture. The PTB have shown their modus operandi over the past 500 years. It only requires a commitment to study on your part to get up to speed.
As usual, LK has opened a large can of worms with a simple question. The answer requires every non-zombie to face the decision of what price they are willing to pay for "peace and security". The evidence and strategy are plain enough to support this speculation.
So, which is it? The freedom to choose your own path? Or the security of having it chosen for you? The former will require you to leave everything behind, while the latter will see everything taken from you by force. By 'everything' I mean dignity and self-achievement, not toys and gee-gaws.
Petraeus served his masters well, and we see the price of his loyalty.
As for me, give me liberty or give me death.
==================================
This just in from another long-time reader, correspondent and benefactor of our efforts...
"Hello Bernard:Excellent points there. Especially the one about the strange Obama zombies. All very worrisome, indeed.
Again, we appreciate your blogs. Keep up the vigil.
In your Y2K+12+Doom rant you posed a good point about all those instantly disappearing dissenters, such as the many Ron Paul supporters, following the Obama 2.0 selection. Like thousands of others I believe had done, I wrote in my vote for Paul. However there is not one mention in the media or alternative media about him that I can find.
I wanted to send you a link to an interesting article that you might not know about because it is on a financial website.
http://www.financialsense.com/contributors/cris-sheridan/big -data-meets-big-government-mon eyball-world-now
Along with moneyball and and scientific advances in neuromarketing techniques being used by the media there isn't much hope for all those Facebook members armed with Ipods and a deficit in critical thinking skills, which is just about everybody. Remember in "The Manchurian Candidate" when everybody in the company was going around parroting the same phrase, "Raymond Shaw is the kindest, bravest, warmest, most wonderful human being I've ever known in my life." Well, a lifelong friend emailed me after the election and said enthusiastically, "Did you hear Obama's acceptance speech? He is the kindest, warmest, most wonderful man!" The heartfelt letdown is that my friend really meant what she said and there was nothing I could say for an answer without being terribly insulting.
Sometime I feel very alone, but your website is a great lift.
Best wishes,
RF
P.S. You know what I miss the most about Indonesia. Riding on a crowded public bus with all those gentle, sensitive people,,,and durian...I miss durian.
As for the durian, I know just what you mean. And that brings up another simple question. Who was the first person to look at a football-sized fruit with lethal spines all over it that smelled like month-old gym socks stuffed with rotten onions and contained yellow, slimy worm-like fruit and think, "Hey, that looks good to eat!"
13.3.12
Uncle Fraud And Aunt Perfidy
Must have been too quiet over there in Afghanistan. Either that, or the US wasn't ready to go home and needed more excuses to stick around and bomb caves and goat herders.
First, it was the Koran burning incident. Now, think about it. If they had put the books in a bag and taken them to the dump and burned them with the weekly trash pile-up, no one would have been the wiser. Instead, it was done in such a way as to make worldwide headlines. Obviously, this was an intentional act of provocation.
But it didn't stir up enough backlash.
So, a soldier is ordered to go out and mow down some women and children in their homes. That seems to be doing the trick. It has stirred up a hornet's nest over there. Of course, the completely screw-ball excuse being floated is that the man had a 'brain injury'. First question: why is he still there and not at the military hosptal in Germany? Second question: if he had a brain injury, why was he issued a weapon and allowed to leave base with a loaded weapon? Third question: why is the US hell-bent on making as many enemies as it can, especially amongst Muslims?
Obvious conclusions: the US is the real terrorist organization, and it ain't finished cremating the Middle East yet.
The whole troop withdrawal thing was nothing more than an election year ploy, and by stirring up fresh hatred and opposition, they can justify keeping boots on the ground and still get the propaganda boost of being ready to come home. What a farce.
In fact, there are a lot of farces going around these days. The whole KONY 2012 (link intentional not given) thing reeks of psy-op. I managed to choke down about 8 minutes of it before I had to cut it off. This is so plainly an attempt to stir up 'invade Africa' sentiment that I can hardly believe anyone is falling for it.
China has spent the last ten years, while the US was dipping Iraqi fingers in purple ink, winning hearts and mines (sic) across the Dark Continent. Unlike the West, which has used deceit and subterfuge to literally steal the mineral wealth of Africa, the Chinese have been trading roads, bridges and power plants for energy, rare earth and timber. Naturally, the local folk are gravitating towards them, and the West needs an excuse to do what it does best...bomb, slay and steal...to put an end to the Oriental Express.
The whole KONY thing just drips with one of those slick 'save the children' tear-jerkers with Archie Bunker's daughter, only instead of ostensibly feeding kids, the goal is to bomb them for financial gain. Yup, when I see a slick 30-minute video with high production value that runs about $50k to $100k to produce, my spidey-sense starts a-twitchin'.
Then there's the whole Bammy farce. Sheriff Joe found probably cause for outright fraud and forgery of government documents that supposedly establish the man's identity. LapDog Media response? s-i-l-e-n-c-e But don't worry, at least Pravda picked up the story. And what does Pravda mean in English? Oh yeah, "truth".
But hey, give the man a break. He's been busy justifying killing and secretly detaining American citizens, stirring up fresh fighting in Afghanistan, and finding ways to keep gasoline prices down for the wage slaves at home.
The one thing that I've really been keeping an eye on though is Ron Paul. Oh sure, everyone has written him off and the media have redoubled their efforts to ignore him, but I think a lot of folks are going to be surprised come the Convention.
See, Paul learned something from my dad. Dad had a plan to run for prez one day, if Nixon hadn't killed his dream. He knew that the primary voting was just window dressing. All the hype and hollering is nothing more than a popularity contest, and means absolutely nothing in the end.
The key is getting delegates, and that is done in the caucuses. I'll use my native Texas as an example. During the day, folks go to the polls and pull the lever (or tap the screen now) and that tallies up how everyone feels, but does not select a single delegate. That part is done after the polls close and the two or three people who know about it show up to choose delegates to the precinct convention. At that convention, they select delegates to the district convention. At that event, they select delegates to the state convention. At that level they select delegates to the national convention. At the national convention, they nominate the candidate.
Newtneyrum can win every vote in Texas, all three or four million of them, and not get a single delegate. The media and Newtneyrun are blindly focused on the popularity contest, but Paul is focused on the caucuses. His supporters are packing the caucuses and making sure the true believers are sent to each level of the convention process. He could conceivably sweep the national convention without ever having won a single state popularity contest.
That's what happens when people believe the bullshit that America is a democracy and not a republic. That's also why they stopped teaching civics in high school and no one ever talks about the real election process. Ignorance elects idiots.
The fraud is at every level and everywhere. And right about now, it is particularly thick and sticky. Why, just yesterday, Drudge had a headline: Tel Aviv in ruins after Iran attacked. If you look at the words, it implies that it had already happened. I even got fooled into clicking. Turned out to be a Mossad hit piece, but banner headlines like that are pure fraud, plain and simple. Not that one should be surprised when the Mossad is involved. They can't even find their ass with both hands when it comes to truth.
One must be extra careful in filtering the news. It's best to read several international rags and compare stories. I'm figuring that the average of 5 or 6 rags from each continent is about as close to truth as we're ever likely to get. To facilitate your efforts, check out ThePaperBoy.com.. And watch out for any publications with the words "Times" or "Herald Tribune" in it. Most likely pure, unadulterated, no artificial coloring bullshit.
First, it was the Koran burning incident. Now, think about it. If they had put the books in a bag and taken them to the dump and burned them with the weekly trash pile-up, no one would have been the wiser. Instead, it was done in such a way as to make worldwide headlines. Obviously, this was an intentional act of provocation.
But it didn't stir up enough backlash.
So, a soldier is ordered to go out and mow down some women and children in their homes. That seems to be doing the trick. It has stirred up a hornet's nest over there. Of course, the completely screw-ball excuse being floated is that the man had a 'brain injury'. First question: why is he still there and not at the military hosptal in Germany? Second question: if he had a brain injury, why was he issued a weapon and allowed to leave base with a loaded weapon? Third question: why is the US hell-bent on making as many enemies as it can, especially amongst Muslims?
Obvious conclusions: the US is the real terrorist organization, and it ain't finished cremating the Middle East yet.
The whole troop withdrawal thing was nothing more than an election year ploy, and by stirring up fresh hatred and opposition, they can justify keeping boots on the ground and still get the propaganda boost of being ready to come home. What a farce.
In fact, there are a lot of farces going around these days. The whole KONY 2012 (link intentional not given) thing reeks of psy-op. I managed to choke down about 8 minutes of it before I had to cut it off. This is so plainly an attempt to stir up 'invade Africa' sentiment that I can hardly believe anyone is falling for it.
China has spent the last ten years, while the US was dipping Iraqi fingers in purple ink, winning hearts and mines (sic) across the Dark Continent. Unlike the West, which has used deceit and subterfuge to literally steal the mineral wealth of Africa, the Chinese have been trading roads, bridges and power plants for energy, rare earth and timber. Naturally, the local folk are gravitating towards them, and the West needs an excuse to do what it does best...bomb, slay and steal...to put an end to the Oriental Express.
The whole KONY thing just drips with one of those slick 'save the children' tear-jerkers with Archie Bunker's daughter, only instead of ostensibly feeding kids, the goal is to bomb them for financial gain. Yup, when I see a slick 30-minute video with high production value that runs about $50k to $100k to produce, my spidey-sense starts a-twitchin'.
Then there's the whole Bammy farce. Sheriff Joe found probably cause for outright fraud and forgery of government documents that supposedly establish the man's identity. LapDog Media response? s-i-l-e-n-c-e But don't worry, at least Pravda picked up the story. And what does Pravda mean in English? Oh yeah, "truth".
But hey, give the man a break. He's been busy justifying killing and secretly detaining American citizens, stirring up fresh fighting in Afghanistan, and finding ways to keep gasoline prices down for the wage slaves at home.
The one thing that I've really been keeping an eye on though is Ron Paul. Oh sure, everyone has written him off and the media have redoubled their efforts to ignore him, but I think a lot of folks are going to be surprised come the Convention.
See, Paul learned something from my dad. Dad had a plan to run for prez one day, if Nixon hadn't killed his dream. He knew that the primary voting was just window dressing. All the hype and hollering is nothing more than a popularity contest, and means absolutely nothing in the end.
The key is getting delegates, and that is done in the caucuses. I'll use my native Texas as an example. During the day, folks go to the polls and pull the lever (or tap the screen now) and that tallies up how everyone feels, but does not select a single delegate. That part is done after the polls close and the two or three people who know about it show up to choose delegates to the precinct convention. At that convention, they select delegates to the district convention. At that event, they select delegates to the state convention. At that level they select delegates to the national convention. At the national convention, they nominate the candidate.
Newtneyrum can win every vote in Texas, all three or four million of them, and not get a single delegate. The media and Newtneyrun are blindly focused on the popularity contest, but Paul is focused on the caucuses. His supporters are packing the caucuses and making sure the true believers are sent to each level of the convention process. He could conceivably sweep the national convention without ever having won a single state popularity contest.
That's what happens when people believe the bullshit that America is a democracy and not a republic. That's also why they stopped teaching civics in high school and no one ever talks about the real election process. Ignorance elects idiots.
The fraud is at every level and everywhere. And right about now, it is particularly thick and sticky. Why, just yesterday, Drudge had a headline: Tel Aviv in ruins after Iran attacked. If you look at the words, it implies that it had already happened. I even got fooled into clicking. Turned out to be a Mossad hit piece, but banner headlines like that are pure fraud, plain and simple. Not that one should be surprised when the Mossad is involved. They can't even find their ass with both hands when it comes to truth.
One must be extra careful in filtering the news. It's best to read several international rags and compare stories. I'm figuring that the average of 5 or 6 rags from each continent is about as close to truth as we're ever likely to get. To facilitate your efforts, check out ThePaperBoy.com.. And watch out for any publications with the words "Times" or "Herald Tribune" in it. Most likely pure, unadulterated, no artificial coloring bullshit.
Labels:
Afghanistan,
bullshit,
mass media,
US presidential election
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)






