A Black Hole In Reason

One of the joyfully idiotic science stories of late is the "imaging" of a black hole in the center of a distant galaxy.  The authors breathlessly note the equatorial "dust" ring and the stunning nothingness in the middle.  Furthermore, follow-on articles note the polar jets soaring in opposite directions from the center of the object.

There are so many things wrong with this article, it is difficult to select a starting point.  But let's give it a shot, shall we?

First off, it is not a photograph of a "black hole".  It is a computer-generated image using algorithms to interpret terabytes of data, almost none of which are photographs in visible light.

Algorithms are mathematical formulae that process data according to a set of proscribed rules.  As such, they reflect the biases of the individuals who create them.  Thus, the image is created by math formulae that manipulate the available data to give the result the researcher is looking for, and ignores the rest.  In other words, scientidiots have preconceived notions of what a black hole should look like, and they assume that a black hole exists in the center of the imaged galaxy, thus the algorithms search for data that conforms to their a priori assumptions.

To put it country simple, we are looking at a picture of some people's imagination, using cherry-picked real data.

Look again at the above image, and note the box on the top right.  This purports to show a plasma jet shooting out of one of the poles of the "black hole".

According to Official Scientidiot Mythology, black holes are regions of infinitely dense matter with gravitational fields so mighty that not even light can escape - even though the escape velocity of an "event horizon" is noted to be the speed of light.

Here on Earth, we have two poles - north and south.  Those poles are designated both by the spin axis of the planet, and by the Earth's magnetic field.  Nowhere in any of the literature I have ever found does anyone claim that gravity is weaker - nay, repulsive - at Earth's poles.  The theory of gravity holds that gravity should be equal and relative to the mass of the central object.  If the object is round, gravity should be equal at all points around it, and that is what we find, with minor variations due to "mascons".

If gravity does not have poles, but magnetism does, then the black hole jets are magnetic phenomena.  The Laws of Physics state that one cannot have magnetism without electricity, nor visa versa.  Therefore, the jets are created by amazingly strong magnetic fields, not gravity, which is many orders of magnitude weaker than electro-magnetism (something like 20 quintillion times weaker).

There is no known mechanism that allows for gravity, even produced by "infinitely dense" objects, to create polar jets moving at relativistic speeds.  We will ignore, for now, the issue of infinity not being a number, and therefore unable to exist in a physical universe.

Particle accelerators, such as the one at CERN, use powerful electro-magnets to push plasma to incredible speeds.  Rail guns use electro-magnets to accelerate metal projectiles.  Electro-magnets are used to levitate and accelerate maglev trains.  None of these technologies uses concentrated gravity.

Yet, we are told that gravity alone concentrates plasma and ejects it preferentially at the poles of an imaginary object.  I suppose if you are creating imaginary objects, though, you can make up any rules you want, and the scientidiots apparently do.

We then move to the lower right box, which purports to show a "dust ring" around the equator of the black hole.

First off, it is not a "ring" like Saturn's rings - nearly two-dimensional.  Instead, it shows a three-dimensional torus at a great distance from the dark center.  This is identical, though vastly larger, to the plasma streams created in any particle accelerator using electro-magnets.  But that's not the only problem.

Back to the issue of gravity not having poles: if gravity does not have poles, then it does not have an equator.  An equator is an artifact of polarized fields, which is why the Earth has Van Allen belts or a particle accelerator creates a cohesive plasma stream.

If the black hole were dreated by gravity, there would be no "ring".  The dust and gas would be pulled equally towards the center of mass in all directions.  There is no mechanism that could create a ring.

What we actually have in the above image is an imaginary object created by algorithms that selectively edit data according to the preconceived ideas of a select group of individuals who all believe the same myth.  This image shows a dark area we are told is an infinitely dense object that doesn't exist in our universe, which is creating polar jets and an equatorial torus using gravity, even though gravity has no mechanism that allows it to do either of those things.

In fact, despite the bias of the researchers, every thing in the image matches known electro-magnetic effects that are regularly produced in laboratories and particle accelerators every day right here on Earth - something no one seems able to do with black holes, thank Einstein.

It is a crying shame that our educational systems cannot produce rational human beings either in the general public, who so gullibely believe and fund this nonsense, nor among the exaulted lab-coat brigades whose lives and careers are funded by the hard-earned money of the gullible public.

For more than a century, we have compounded error with error until we have created a system that produces imaginary pictures from computer algorithms and pawns them off on an unsuspecting audience as plausible reality.

I won't even go into the fact that decades of studies of SigA* at the center of our own galaxy have proved beyond all doubt that a black hole does not exist there, despite the insistence of over-paid labcoaters to the contrary.

It's high time to #StopTheFunding.

Einstein Is A Senile Old Fart

Ugh!  I get so tired of Corporate Science ramming complete fiction down our throats.  Even worse is the way we "lay people" just swallow it and move along.  No one ever stops to say, "Hey!  Wait a minute..."

The thing is we are all conned into thinking we can't handle such lofty thoughts as General and Special Relativity, and that we can't rise to the Olympian heights of Einstein and Hawking.

The fact of the matter is, these guys are just making this shit up in order to sound like they know what they are talking about.  Honestly!  They have no more idea than you or me how the Universe works, so they cover their ignorance in meaningless symbols and sell it to us as Life, the Universe and Everything, so they can pocket the grant money and Nobel Prizes for...well, nothing.  Literally.

Bear with me for a few minutes, and I will prove that you are smarter than Einstein and Hawking combined!  I'll even throw in Neil deGrasse Tyson just to up the ante a bit.  This will require a tiny bit of thinking, but I promise it won't hurt, and that crashing sound will be all the rubbish you learned in school collapsing to the ground.  When we are done, you can read this article and laugh out loud at the ignorance behind it, just like I did.

1. Time
OK, this is the hardest part of the whole thing.  Right now, without thinking about it, point in the direction of Time.  Got it?

Now, which way did you point?  Ah, see the problem?  Time isn't a dimension.  It's a concept.  It has not existence in reality.  We just made it up by dividing all the various cycles in our world into small pieces so that we could all be late for our appointments.  A second is the average length of a human heart beat.  An hour is 1/24th of the Earth's rotation.  A month is one orbit of the Moon around the Earth.  A year is one orbit around the Sun.  A Great Year is one precession of the Earth's poles (~24,000 years).  The only thing important to the Universe is that effect always follows cause.  That's not Time, the way we think of it, because there is no standard amount of waiting between cause and effect without some reference system, such as the human heart beat.

2. Space
Space is nothing more than a set of coordinates.  It is not tangible, can not be rippled, and it has no relation to time other than we measure how many heart beats it takes to get from one point to another.  Space is defined as six discrete points on 3 axes: x, y and z.  Why five points?  Well, in order to define the location of an object, we need six references: we need an object, an observer, two x points left and right of the object, and two y points above and below the object.  Since there are only three spacial dimensions, why do we need six points?  Good question.

You need an object to measure (point one).  You need an observer (point two).  Together, these two points give us the z axis.  Then, you need reference points in order to define x and y.  These points define an imaginary surface, or plane, on which to project a scale (inches, feet, meters, kilometers, etc.).  Notice that none of this involves time, since time has nothing to do with locating something in space.

Since space is nothing more than a set of coordinates used to local objects in reference to an observer, it has no physical existence.  It is not a plasma, liquid, gas or solid.  It can not be rippled, waved or bent.  It is just a set of numbers so I can find, or tell you how to find, an object.

3. Gravity
The best way to think of gravity is static electricity.  Objects stick to the face of the Earth because, like dipole magnets, opposites attract.  The positive Earth attracts out negative body to it's center.  We stop because the the bonds between the atoms of the Earth's surface repel the bonds between the atoms of our bodies.  So we are stuck to the surface like socks are to your shirt in the dryer.  If we could change the polarity of the Earth, everything would fly off of it, rather than stick to it.

Most importantly, there is no gravitational constant.  Sure, on Earth gravity always works at 32 feet/second squared, but it changed when you go into orbit, or the Moon, or Mars, or the Sun.  To force Earth normal on the entire Universe is...well, ridiculous.

Finally, gravity is 20 billion times weaker than the Weak Nuclear Force (see below), so it has little or no effect on the structure and function of the Universe.

4. Forces of Nature
Everything in the Universe is some manifestation of electricity.  All objects interact using one of more of the Four Natural Forces: 1) Electro-Magnetic, 2) Strong Nuclear, 3) Weak Nuclear, and 4) Gravitation.  Given what we already know about gravity, we can probably eliminate this one and put all the effects of it under #1.  Of the remaining three, they guide the way all particles in the Universe interact, from the atomic level to the super-galactic level.  They are observable at every scale, and can be reproduced in any laboratory with the right tools.

No need for CERN, LIGO or any of these other multi-billion dollar BOHICA machines whose results can never be verified because there are no other machines to duplicate the results (e.g. it ain't science).  From the quantum to the macro, everything works on the same principles.  The only difference between an atom and a galaxy is scale.

So, now we come to Black Holes.  These are conceptual things that do not exist, but were created to correct some of the many problems with Einstein's Relativity.  See, Einstein simplified a lot of things to make his formulas easier to solve.  In doing so, he made it impossible for his results to be scaled up to the Universe at large, and thus a lot of chewing gun and bailing wire had to be used to make it work.  Black Holes are a huge piece of chewing gum.

One of the biggest problems with Black Holes is one of the easiest and most obvious to see.  Hawking, Tyson and all their drinking buddies will tell you that the Universal speed limit is the speed of light, and the escape velocity from the surface/even horizon of a black hole is the speed of light.  But black holes are black because light can't escape.

Immedicately, they are in a bind.  Either light can escape because it is travelling the speed of light, or the speed of light is not constant in the Universe.  Either way, the entire foundation of General Relativity comes crashing down.  See the problem?

Instead of admitting this inherent contradiction, they cover it up with lots of mathematical mumbo-jumbo and a few $64 words and keep going, knowing that the educational system is so bad, no one will ever question this slight-of-hand.  Rather, what we get is a menagerie of black holes, from micro to super-massive, and folks like NASA claiming to have "found" 2.5 million of them.  For us smart folks, every time you read about a new black hole, just think to yourself, "Ah, another mystery they can't explain."  That's the purpose of black holes, really.  They just cover up mysteries with them so they don't have to do real work and can get billions in free money to investigate their own slight-of-hand.

All modern cosmology is little more than a bunch of magicians telling us they don't do "tricks."  It's "real magic" and by the way, we don't understand how it's done, so could you slip up a few billion to try and figure this out?

And by the way, you can prove the speed of light is not constant AND explain "gravitational lensing" with a very simple experiment in your kitchen.  Take a clear glass.  Fill it with water.  Take a spoon and put it in the glass.  Now look at it from the side.  See how the spoon looks bent?  You've just proved Einstein, Hawking, Tyson, and a whole bunch of other numbnuts wrong.

Don't you feel smart now?

Catching Up With Readers

When Daniel Webster first produced his English Language Dictionary, a female member of one of America's early busy-body groups thanked him for not including bad words in his book,  In reply, he thanked her for looking.

And so it goes.  A lot of the reader responses I get around here are from folks convinced that I am either an idiot, a crank, or both, to which I reply, "Thanks for clicking!"

One reader sent a rather passionate note asking how I could support Marco Rubio in my "Random Thoughts On Politics."  I went back and reread the post and could not find a supporting comment anywhere.  I did, however, find a bit where I stated I thought he would win the nomination as a "dark horse" compromise candidate despite any success of the Trump campaign.  Hardly offering my support.

My statement was based simply on my project to track major world events as possible outcomes foreseen in Eastern and Western astrology, and outlined in my post called, "Get Your Yang Red Fire Monkey On!"  Perhaps the connection is not immediately obvious, leading the reader to misinterpret my hypothesis.

The connections are rather subtle, so follow along if you dare.

The name 'Marco' derives from the Latin name 'Marcus,' which itself derives from 'Mars,' the Roman god of war and the name of our fourth planet, which happens to be reddish.  The name 'Rubio' is quite simply the Latin word for "red."  This makes the name translate as "red Mars" (in Romance languages the adjective follows the noun).  Thus, "red," "war" (chaos/fire), and politicians being often characterized as "trained monkeys."

See the connections?  But wait...it gets better.

Mars opposition this year (month of May) will bring the Earth and Mars extremely close and Mars will be very prominent in the night sky for a month or so.  In Western astrology, this would imply a strong influence by Mars in Earthly events, bringing war and chaos in its wake.  It would, to follow this line of thought, imply also that someone named Marco Rubio (red Mars) could be heavily influenced by this alignment (for the better one assumes).

Thus, Marco Rubio seems fated by both Eastern and Western astrology to have a rather stunning rise in the next couple of months, since red, fire, war, chaos, and Mars all figure quite heavily in the stars.  I do not claim to believe any of this, nor do I endorse Rubio or predict his success.  I am simply watching events unfold with an eye to testing astrology.

By the way, Mars will be at very close oppositions with Earth until 2027, so we likely haven't seen the last of Rubio in any event, if there is any veracity in astrology, East or West.

The next set of comments came from several readers who couldn't wait to lambast me for attacking St. Albert in "Einstein Is STILL An Idiot."  Everything from mild chiding to outright hostility lit up the mailbox, which I love.  It means something I said stirred folks up, which is really the whole point of this exercise.  I like it when folks' weltanschauungs are challenged.  It may not change the entrenched and calcified minds, but it may just open others to new ideas and critical thinking.

At any rate, most of the mail and comments about the article were to remind me of what an idiot I am, and I don't deny it.  However, I can still see when someone mixes Wheaties with my Cheerios and tries to pass it off as Sugar Pops.

The point was this: there are four Big Bang Theories and three Black Hole Theories.  They are all mutually exclusive in that a Big Bang Universe cannot contain Black Holes, and vice versa.  Sorry if that pops your bubble, but it's true.

Therefore, to say that gravity waves caused by the merging of two Black Holes proves Einstein's Theory of General Relativity is probably the most idiotic, contradictory and numbnut/buckethead claim ever made.  In Black Hole theories, there can be no other mass in the Universe, much less two Black Holes, and thus, there can be no objective point from which to observe gravity waves, nor even additional space into which they can propagate.

One comment said that the photo of Einstein and the formula showed clearly the question mark at the end of the equation.  See?  Even Einstein was smart enough to know that a Black Hole negated the Big Bang, gravity waves, gravity lensing, and just about everything else you can think of, especially all the stuff his theory predicted.

I find it to be a cheap and dirty trick on the part of the "scientists" (whoever they are) to presume upon the ignorance of the average lay person by claiming that an obvious contradiction proves a hypothetical mathematical construct.  It is the height of contempt on the part of these "scientists" for the lay person to pull this sort of crap while claiming they need more of our tax money to continue finding more proof of a contradiction.

And we haven't even gotten to the part about space-time being a nonsensical thing and most certainly not a medium by which to propagate waves.  Posh and piffle, you say?  Fine, please point in the direction of "time."  I'll wait.  And while you are at it, please tell me why clocks "measure" time, yet I can have two of them together with different times displayed and both can be wrong?  After all, I can use two tape measures to discern the exact dimensions of the 2-by-4 about to hit you upside the head, and both will agree.

OK, so enough fun for now.  Thanks for reading and writing, regardless of why or what.  We enjoy stirring up a little shit once in a while.  Keeps life interesting.

Einstein Is STILL An Idiot!

Take a good look at the photo of Einstein here.  I mean a really close look.  You are about to discover that Einstein was wrong and that he is STILL an idiot.

As are most physicists today.

Now, don't you feel smart?

If you don't see what I'm talking about, then look at the formula he just wrote in the photo.  R(sub ik)=0.  See it yet?

OK, I won't keep you in suspense.  The formula basically says that there is nothing outside a Black Hole.  You read that right.  Nothing outside a Black Hole.  In other words, according to Einstein's General Theory of Relativity, there is NO UNIVERSE outside a black hole.  Just to make sure the point drives home, if a black hole exists anywhere in the Universe, then we are not here to talk about it.

Now, I know what you are thinking, "Dude, you don't have a doctorate in Physics and receive billions of dollars in grants to build LIGO machines and CERN machines and have never been nominated for a Nobel Prize."

Maybe not, but as an auto didact who doesn't believe anything coming out of the mouths of self-proclaimed "experts," I can certainly look it up.  And I did.  And I found a guy names Steven J. Crothers, who does have lots of letters after his name and can solve the equations that produce the answer R(sub ik)=0.  An he clearly (even for dummies like me) shows that according to Einstein, we don't exist if black holes do.

So, who cares?

Well, you may have heard all the hoopla recently about the discovery of "gravity waves" by devices called LIGO in Washington State and Louisiana.  "Oooh," they said, "Did you see that?  It was caused by two black holes colliding and thus we just proved Einstein was right!"

I raised my hand.  "Excuse me," I said, "But if you just proved Einstein right then we are not really here discussing colliding black holes and gravity waves."  Everyone ignored me, of course, as they always do with kill-joys at big parties.  Something like that would threaten all that juicy tax money flowing in.

I wasn't alone.  Wal Thornhill, head thinker over at the Thunderbolts Project also caught the glaring problem. And he's a lot smarter than I am, too.

According to Wal, the LIGO instrument depends on having two very long tubes with LASERS shining down the centers of both to a collector in the center.  The tubes are vacuumed out to the point of being much emptier than empty space - as in 'up there.'  What they failed to tell everyone, and us everyones are thinking, "hey, that's pretty vacuous," is that nothing stops neutrinos.

Now, if you're not up to date on neutrinos, those are near-massless particles that can pass through the entire Earth without touching anything, as if it's not there.  In fact, there are other machines in Italy, Japan and Antarctica - that cost billions of dollars too - to try and catch some neutrinos.  In decades of operations, they've only managed to see a handful of them when by sheer chance, they hit a molecule of water and let out a little photon of blue light.

So, now you're probably thinking what I'm thinking, "Hey wait a minute, they spent billions on machines to detect particles that negate the findings of the other machines that found gravity waves?!"  Yup, great minds think alike.  See how smart we are?

I probably don't have to go much further here to get you to start wondering if all those idiots up there talking about gravity waves are con artists looking to generate a little more tax money to fund their Starbucks runs and probably a really big party celebrating how clever they were in fooling all us taxpayers.

The point here, and it's pretty important, is don't believe anyone who calls themselves an "expert," especially if their income is dependent on governments stealing money from us hard-working folks.  They use all this high-falootin' language and scribble incomprehensible formulae (that's the real plural version) on black boards to bamboozle us into handing over more money so they can build bigger machines to make us think they know what they are talking about.

Hey, you know what?  That sounds a lot like the way kings used to tax the crap out of us hard-working folks to build equally useless cathedrals back in the Middle Ages.  Only difference is cathedrals were rather pretty and were open to common folk to come in and look around.  It's not likely we could have the same privileges with the modern versions.

Our walking, talking and breathing might disturb the LASER gods inside the not-so-empty tubes.

Amazing what you can learn when you take a moment to do a little reading.

By the way, while I'm thinking about it, has anyone heard anything about the Ceres lights since the Dawn spacecraft reached its optimal (and closest) mapping orbit?  Yeah, me neither.

Time On My Hands

Time is one of the most enduring staples of science fiction.  How we experience time, what time is and whether time can be toyed with has long been one of the deepest ponders of humanity.  And walking hand-in-hand with time is the nature of the Universe.  Are there multiple Universes?  Can we enter or experience those other Universes?  Does anything we do affect the number, size or nature of other Universes?  You can easily get lost in these sorts of thoughts.

How we experience time is obviously relative.  As Albert Einstein himself explained it, "When a man sits with a pretty girl for an hour, it seems like a minute. But let him sit on a hot stove for a minute and it's longer than any hour. That's relativity."  Time is a fluid in which we are drowning, sometimes quickly, sometimes slowly, but always sinking.

Then there's the whole issue of probability and possibility.  Something can be possible without being probably, but rarely can something be probable without being possible.  As Sherlock Holmes said, "Once you have eliminated the impossible, what remains, no matter how improbable, must be the truth."

In modern physics, as misguided and limited as it is, there is a mainstream theory of multiple Universes that states that the so-called Big Bang may have happened multiple times, and that there is a hyper-verse that looks something like a bubble bath with millions of bubbles all crowding each other.  Whether it is possible to communicate between these bubbles is still hotly debated.

An alternative concept, though not generally taken seriously by mainstream physics (which gives it far more credibility in my book) is the multi-verse concept.  This theory posits that there are as many Universes as there are choices.  Every time you face a choice between A, B or C, you create a reality in which you experience A, but two alternate Universes are created in which you chose B or C.  Furthermore, this process is repeated for every single living being that makes choices at every point within the Universe.

In other words, there are infinite numbers of Universes and more are being created all the time.

The classic Time Paradox thought experiment says that you travel back in time.  You kill your grandfather, thus you can not possibly exist, and yet you do.  Have you changed the conditions of the current Universe, or have you created an alternate Universe?

One of the finest stories along the lines of the first concept is Ray Bradbury's A Sound of Thunder.  A hunter travels back in time to kill a T. Rex, but panics and leaves the proscribed path, killing a butterfly in the process.  When the party returns to the present, language has changed.  People have changed.  And history has changed.  This story inspired Michael Crichton to write Jurassic Park.  Well worth a Saturday in bed.

Along the lines of the second option, Robert Heinlein penned his classic The Number of the Beast.  Inspired by E. R. Burroughs' Barsoom series, the characters travel through multiple embedded Universes encoded in the "number of the beast" (666) that include Universes created by fiction writers, not just choices.  Lots of nudity and gratuitous sex.  You'll love it!

Really, though, what is time?  Supposedly we can't see the future, yet in very mainstream and accepted physical theory, time is a double cone extending into the future and the past, and we should be able to see both time zones with equal clarity given the proper tools.  In other words, given the correct tool and knowing where to look, we should be able to see Earth at anytime in the past or future.  General Relativity and Light Theory demand it.

Equally possible is the ability to adjust our perception and thus enter any number of multiple embedded Universes.  All it takes is learning the 'trick' to turning just so in order to do it.

The first theory states that there is only one time line and that any change to it affects everything from that point into the future.  Think of this as the 'railroad' theory.  You start in Chicago and go to New York.  If you change any conditions on the rail, you can jam the train or change its destination.  The changes are irrevocable, though you can always return to the point of origin and try again by adjusting the conditions of the rail.

The second theory states that you board the train in Chicago and along the way, if conditions change, you create multiple trains that do different things depending on how those conditions affect the train's path.  It's possible to experience all possible outcomes, though maybe not at once.

So where does all this leave us?

We know for a fact that where we are at this very moment is the result of an incomprehensible number of choices, options and decisions spanning all of time, however much that is.  We also know that any and every choice, option and decision we take now will profoundly affect our lives and have a ripple effect across time and space, even if we aren't aware of all the consequences.  Think about that the next time you kill a cockroach.

What all this boils down to is, what is time?  Is it a physical phenomenon and one day we will discover chronitons, particles of time?  Or is it a dimension that we perceive, like height, width and depth?  Or is it a construct of our minds, like a clothesline on which we hang our exeriences to dry into memories and give historians gainful employment?

If you were given the chance to go back in your life and change one decision, would you do it?  Would you take the risk on what ripples that would make in your present?  Or do you see it as an opportunity to jump into an alternate reality at that particular junction that wouldn't affect anything in this particular reality?

The beauty of this particular ponder is that it allows us to ask a very simple question - what if - and then explore all sorts of different possibilities.

What's really fun is that your concept of time shows you how limited your concept of 'god' is.  If time is an unalterable arrow, then your 'god' is very limited.  On the other hand, if time is as dynamic and pliable as water, then your 'god' is unlimited.  How's that for a mind-bender?

At any rate, the next time someone asks you, "What time is it?"  Give them the response, "Sidereal or synodic?"  Watch their expression.  Maybe I'll even do a YouTube series of people's reactions.  Fun idea.

Worst case scenario, just burst into Jim Croce lyrics:

But there never seems to be enough time

To do the things you want to do

Once you find them

I've looked around enough to know

That you're the one I want to go

Through time with

Einstein Was An Idiot

OK, so the headline is a bit sensational, but it's true.  Einstein got it exactly backwards.

See, General and Special Relativity are good, solid theories.  They are predictive and engineerable.  They unified electricity and magnetism.  But, using his theories, you will never get the Holy Grail of Physics: The Grand Unified Theory of Everything (aka GUT).  And without GUT, you will never get to the nearest star in a single lifetime, much less have regular commutes to Mars.

Here's the problem.  I can prove mathematically that we live on the inside of a sphere, and that the entire Universe is condensed into an ever increasing ball in the middle.  That doesn't mean it's true, but the math is there.

Einstein could prove that a massive object warps Space/Time causing a gravity well.  But, the truth of the matter is that the gravity well creates the massive object.

Just like Einstein, we need to do a mental exercise to see how this works.

Let's start with a container full of absolutely pure water.  It has no impurities.  It is homogeneous throughout.  Every part looks exactly like every other part.  You can sample the medium at any point and it will look just like any other sample anywhere in the 'universe' we have created.  This is the Medium or Aether, as it is sometimes called.

Now imagine that this homogeneous whole divides itself into two distinct but equal parts.  It is still pure, but there is some kind of division between the two parts.  At this point, we have identity.  We can say, "I and you."  This is the ultimate act of Creation, the Great Mystery, the Trinity: two equal parts and a membrane sepertating them.  This moment is the definition of God.  It is the ultimate Unknown.  What could cause this division is anybody's guess.  Let's leave this part to the theologians.

Now, this Universe continues to divide.  Ultimately, it creates 'cells' as large as the Universe itself, and as small as the Higgs boson, and everything in between.  Within each large division, smaller divisions coagulate to form "mass".

The smallest divisions, Higgs bosons, link with slightly largest masses, quarks.  Quarks link with gluons.  Gluons and quarks form positrons, neutrons and electrons.  These join to form atoms, and atoms join to form larger structures, like living beings and planets and stars.

See how this works?  From nothing, we have something.  All that we know and understand is nothing more than smaller and smaller divisions of the Primal Nothing...the Trinity.

There is no Big Bang or Strings or Quanta...there's only the Whole which divides itself into multiple cells.  It is the folding of Space/Time into many pieces that creates matter, not the matter that creates Space/Time.

And the nature of Space/Time is a spiral.  How do we know that?

Well, every manifestation of 'matter' is a spiral.  DNA, snail shells, finger prints, fractals.  They're all spirals.  If you think about it, our Solar System is a spiral.  The planets follow the Sun.  The Sun is whizzing around the Galaxy while spiraling around something else.  We whiz around the Sun, and if you plot it out against a neutral background, then the planets form spirals as they follow the Sun.  We simply perceive it as a circle because of our frame of reference.

Therefore, the nature of the Universe, and the nature of God is a spiral.  The event that formed the first division in our Primordial Water was a spiral.  It was an eddy in the Great Scheme of Things.  The thing we worship is the Spoon that Started It All.

Even though we perceive the world as having stationary things, like our houses, the fact of the matter is that our houses are spinning at 18,000/mph, and moving through space, which is moving through more space.  If you plotted this out against a stationary piece of graph paper, it would make a spiral.

The Moon spins around the Earth, the Earth spins around the Sun, the Sun spins around the Galaxy, the Galaxy spins around the Local Group, et cetera ad nauseum.  Against a theoretical stationary observer, it all appears to make spirals.

Here's the classic physics thought experiment.  You are on a motorcycle.  You drop a ball.  To you, the ball appears to fall straight down.  To someone statnding on the sidewalk, it falls in an arc.  An arc is part of a spiral.

Therefore, Spiro-Graph was an absolutely magnificent gift that sensitized a whole generation to the nature of the Universe.  That's why they stopped making it.

When it comes right down to it, there is no difference between any of the physical manifestations of 'reality'.  There is no electrical, magetic, and gravitational force.  There is only eddies in Space/Time.

That's why Einstein was an idiot.  He started to see the Big Picture towards the end of his life, but he died about 20 years too soon.  If he had lived, he could have seen the error of his ways and understood why God doesn't play dice with the Universe.

Because 'popular' physics follows Einstein, it has gone down a mental cul-de-sac.  It is going round and round trying to find a way forward, but can't because the grant money isn't there to pursue Reality.

Mankind has already discovered Reality, thousands of years ago.  The problem is that Benny Hinn and Joel Osteen got ahold of it and warped it into Einsteinian navel-staring and televangical bullshit.

The Truth is out there.  You just have to throw away all the crap that 'mainstream' thinkers are spewing.  Let the sacred cows go.  There are no disjointed theories, only disjointed thinking.

Let the Games begin!

The reality is right there under our noses.  It's all been scrambled with impurities.  Go back to the original pure state and start over.  You've done this before.  When all else fails, throw it all out and start from the beginning.  Then you can see things clearly.

Einstein was an idiot.  Keep that in mind and you will find that you are MUCH smarter than he was.  You were born with it, because you are a spiral just like the rest of the Universe.

Space Nazis Must Die!

As prologue, I must say that I have been absolutely fascinated by the Cosmos since the time I can remember anything at all. My mother reports that even in the crib, I watched intently as John Glenn roared into space. I received special tours at NASA Houston and Martin Marietta when I was 8 and 9 years old. I have met many astronauts, including Alan Shepherd and Gene Cernan.

At university, I studied Astro-physics under Pinske, receiving straight As, and discussed superconducting materials with Paul Chu when he was a graduate student. So while I am only an amateur in the field, I am not entirely clueless when it comes to the subject. With a little effort (brushing off the cobwebs), I could plot a trans-lunar orbit.

For this reason, I have followed the works or people like Richard Hoagland, Thomas van Flandern, Charles Berliz, Halton Aarp, and many others with rapt attention. These people, for the most part, have been sidelined by the mainstream, despite the fact that many of their theories fit observable fact far better, and with amazing predictive ability, than anything in the more generally accepted models.

To pick one of hundreds of examples, the Electric Universe theory predicted that comets would resemble asteroids, while the standard model said they were dirty iceballs. Well, after five close fly-bys of comets and numerous changes and patches on the standard model, the Electric Universe theory is batting a thousand.

All of this is by way of saying that when I came across the work of a fellow by the name of Joseph P. Farrell, I was absolutely floored. Here is an Oxford don who has very credibly taken dozens of far-flung theories, as well as historical records of Nazis in the post-war era, and tied them together with meticulous documentaion. He has pulled together Nazi loot, Martin Boorman, Project Paperclip, Roswell, Kecksburg, the Philadelhia Experiment, the Exploded Planet theory, and Hyperdimensional Physics into a single, coherent theory that meets the highest standards of scholarship and scrutiny.

Before I get too far into this, I should link you over to an interview, in which Dr. Farrell lays out his theory in a pretty good overview, although it is up to the reader to go an research the many details. Dr. farrell has about 11 or 12 books now, with more planned, that serve to pull all these disparate strings into a neat bow. I will warn you that if you are not prepared to have your mind blown, you may find yourself in a state of profound cognitive dissonance as everything you learned in school is torn apart and reassembled. The problem lies in the fact that everything you've been taught is pretty much wrong, but if you read this material with an open mind, you will find it fits with what you know intuitively. Furthermore, the documentation is impeccable, especially in the case of Dr. Farrell's research.

It is difficult to summarize Dr. Farrell's work, since its scope reaches into the depths of time and comes current at the extant global financial crisis. His jumping off point is a certain technology that was being developed by the Nazi war machine called the Nazi Bell. It involved testing technology that opened the door to higher dimensions and would have led to unimaginable developments in energy, propulsion and, of course, weapons. The physics behind this device were established in the late 18oos, and further developed by such folks as Einstein, Jessup and other notable scientists and theorticians.

Farrell further postulates that Martin Boorman escaped post-war Germany, taking a vast treasure of gold, currency and other valuables, that were laundered by Anglo-American banking houses, which in turn led to the current crisis, through the years of Western global heginmony. He traces the money and the players across the globe and pieces together a plausible and documented story that compells the reader to concur with his conclusions.

In other works, Farrell demonstrates a connection between the secret knowledge guarded by any number of underground societies, such as the Freemasons, and the development of huperdimensional physics, which is where Hoagland, et al., step in. Einstein's Unified Field work, combined with that of people such as Tesla, open the door for torsion physics and things such as Zero-Point Energy and Field Propulsion. This draws in the dramatic rise in UFO sigtings in the decades since the end of WWII, and events such as Roswell and Kecksburg, as well as the Philadelphia Experiment.

The secret knowledge alluded to previously is derived from the idea that there was a highly advanced HUMAN civilizstion that existed millions of years ago, and whose technoliges and subsequent wars have left us a legacy of ancient documents and an asteroid belt between Mars and Jupiter, not to mention dramatic ruins on the Moon, Mars, around Saturn, and of course, here on Earth. The war that destroyed the planet that is now the asteroid belt, generally referred to as the Cosmic War, nearly wiped out humankind and has left us in a Dark Ages that has spanned roughly three million years. It has also left us fables in the forms of ancient tects from Sumer, Phoenicia, India, the Mid East, and many other cultures, of gods and fantastic events in the Heavens, which if read with a critical eye, actually encode hyperdimensional physics and sacred geobetry. It is further positited that events such as the Crusades, and even the recent Gulf Wars, have been to recapture the original texts and to lock up the information in certain hands. In fact, it might even be that the so-called WMD thaat Saddam was said to have, was in fact knowledge taken from ancient Sumerian tablets.

As you can see, the implications of one device, that was designed and tested by the Nazis towards the end of the war, leads one into a dizzying journey of the mind, that if one is not prepared for it, can cause great discomfort. It goes to the root of everything we think we know about history, science and the Universe at large.

I keep going back to the well-worn quote, "The Universe is not only qyeerer than we imagine, it is queerer than we CAN imagine."

Certainly, the explosion of technoly since the end of WWII and the development of quantum theory and field dynamics argues that something seminal occured around the 1930a and 1940s. The sheer number of Nazis involved in America's space program and atomic research is telling of a knowledge that they possessed and which America exploited. Certainly, the argument of Boorman's loot being the foundation of the global financial crisis puts a handle on that whole quagmire, that otherwise seems too islolated from historical timelines.

Humans seemingly have a 'truth meter' built into them. When we hear truth, it resonates with something deep inside and compells us to further research and deeper knowledge. It's easy for us to lose sight of the greater context of the Universe, when our entire lives generally center around a small geographical location on a small planet orbiting an average star in the far reaches of an everage galaxy. Most people don't want to stretch their minds beyond the day-to-day needs of eating and paying bills and school reports. However, for those who do, these are exciting times! People like Farrell and scores of others are building a remarkable picture of human history that is far more exciting and, at least to me, makes far more sense of our extant condition, than anything offered to me from the gray tomes of generally accepted theory.

Context has a way of making many pieces look like a whole picture. The work of the people mentioned here, and so many more, are allowing the aware mind to pull back and see how the puzzle fits together, and also links our puny planet into the Cosmos and beyond. It is an exciting time for those willing to push boundaries and to see things that have been beyond seeing for possibly millennia. In the current upheaval, one can perceive a global Renaissance on the horizon beckoning the truth-seeker further and further into to both the past and the future.

It is a dangerous time, to be sure. On an individual basis, these current events can be deadly. However, at the scale of civilization and planetary history, it is almost breathless as we await the revelations to come. People line Farrell pry open the mind and make the curious heart race with excitement. But, it also calls to mind the proverbial warning:

Those who forget their history are doomed to repeat it.

In order to avoid the pitfalls in front of us, we must have an accurate map of where wer have been, and a correct orientation in the larger picture. Navigation requires knowing your precise location or the map is useless.

These enterprising and scholarly folks are the navigators standing at the starboard gunwale and sighting our course. We, as individuals and as a civilization, are forced to choose: do we sail in circles until we rack up on the rocks? Or do we heed those who have crossed these seas before and left us maps in time?

These are exciting times indeed, however, as the Chinese curse reminds us, they are dangerous, as well.

May you live in interesting times.