When you think about it, there are no such things as dimensions, and we do not live in three, four and any number of dimensions. There are only measurements and coordinates.
There is nothing that exists that is not three dimensional. Whether it is a cell, a molecule, an atom, an electron, a quark, lepton, gluon, muon, tauon, boson, whatever, they all have height, length and width. There is no such thing as a one or two dimensional object. Nothing can exist without a measurement in all three directions, even if the measurement is Planck's Length. According to theory, nothing smaller than Planck's Length can be measured, therefore nothing can exist beyond it.
If nothing can exist without all three dimensions, then to label the measurements as dimensions is meaningless, since they cannot be extracted from one another. Mathematical abstractions don't count. To use an hypothetical one-dimensional 'point' in space may be useful in theoretical calculations, but in the real Universe, there is no such thing. If you remove all but one dimension from an object, it ceaases to exist. Mind games, such as Flatland are fun to explore as mental calisthenics, but in our reality, these are only abstractions.
When we come to time, we are in far greater trouble to call this a dimension. With the first three, we can point in the direction of their vectors. We can measure them with objective instruments. We can move freely among them. But with time, none of these properties exist.
Time is nothing more than our arbitrary means of separating past, present and future. A clock is not an objective measuring device. No matter how accurate it is, the settings and readings are arbitrarily set by someone at some random starting point. Time has no vector. You cannot point in the direction of time. And if time is relative, then it most certainly is not a real thing in our real Universe.
A day is not an objective measure. It is a measure of Earth's position/coordinates in space from when the Sun is overhead to when it is overhead again. A year is nothing more than measuring Earth's coordinates in space from an arbitrary point until the Earth returns to that point again. The numbers we assign to those concepts can and do vary all the time, and they are not the same elsewhere in the Universe. A Martian day is nearly an hour longer than on Earth, and a Venusian day is longer than its year. A year on Pluto has not passed since the American Revolution.
Conversely, kilometer on Earth would be the same on Mars, or anywhere else in the Universe, but time is subjective. As Father Einstein himself observed, when you go to the carnival with a beautiful girl, and hour seems like a minute, but when you sit on a hot stove, a minute seems like an hour. You cannot go in the direction of the future, then change your mind and go back to the past. The concept of time is truly meaningless, while space is full of fixed points.
When it comes down to it, time is nothing more than measurements of distances traveled: the rotations and orbits of masses in space. If you could completely stop an object's motion, time would cease to exist for it, since there would be no way to measure it passing except with subjective and arbitrary devices like clocks. The only way time could exist for the stopped object is to measure changing distances to some other object. Therefore, time is nothing more than movement along one of the spacial axes/dimensions.
At this point, we have dismissed time as a dimension. That is a meaningless concept. When it comes to spacial dimensions, one cannot be separated from the other; no coordinate can ever be zero because for something to exist, it must have coordinates in three dimensions. As for higher spacial dimensions, they may exist, but if you read Flatland (link above) you will realize that we can never experience them, much less point in their directions. They are meaningless in a real world.
To further beat home the point, modern physics has speculated endlessly on something called "space-time" for the past century, as if there is proof that this imaginary fabric of the Universe actually exists. It doesn't. It is a fabrication of Relativity Theory in order to visualize something being warped by gravity. In this concept, gravity is not a force but a result of objects falling into rubber sheets.
In fact, there is no "space-time." The Universe is a vast collection of coordinates filled with a 'foam' of neutrinos, akin to stem cells of reality, which are the being the building blocks of all we perceive. Gravity is nothing more than a complex form of static electricity, pushing and pulling on objects like magnetic poles - like repel, opposites attract.
The Universe is really quite simple and comprehensible if you strip away all the mythical and mystical mumbo-jumbo that has formed a scum on the pond of clear thinking these past 100 years. You can experience the Universal fundamentals by strumming a guitar, watch waves at the beach, playing with magnets, or sticking you finger in a light socket. Everything else is little more than an attempt to mystify us mortals, thus requiring a priesthood of scientists to interpret Life's Great Secrets for us. In other words, nothing more than a new religion.
When we strip away all the magical incantations and mystical mathematics that the Einseinian priesthood has foisted on us, we find the the Universe is conceptually and functionally simple and pure. Vibrations, electricity and magnetism explain all we can experience, and all of it can be measured objectively in all parts of the Universe.
It's time taxpayers demand an end to the "grant money trough." It's not that I oppose scientific inquiry, or supporting real science, but the system currently in place is nothing more than a means of political control over science to maintain the accepted mythology at the expense of real understanding. Taxpayers have shouldered the burden of massive boondoggles, such as LHC and other billion-dollar scams to find things that don't exist. If experiments cannot be translated into technology that improves humanity's lot, then stop throwing huge bales of tax money at them. A Higgs boson or a Gravity Wave (neither of which exist) will not result in any usable information that can transform our daily lives.
It's time we stop worshipping "authority." Neil DeGrsse Tyson has no more idea what he is talking about than you do. We must realize that each of us has the sense and ability to understand the Universe. It's just a matter of opening our minds.
Here Thar Be Monsters!
From the other side of the argument to the other side of the planet, read in over 149 countries and 17 languages. We bring you news and opinion with an IndoTex® flavor. Be sure to check out the Home Site. Send thoughts and comments to bernard atradiofarside.com, and tell all your friends. Note comments on this site are moderated to remove spam. Sampai jumpa, y'all.
Showing posts with label General Relativity. Show all posts
Showing posts with label General Relativity. Show all posts
25.3.16
21.2.16
Einstein Is STILL An Idiot!
Take a good look at the photo of Einstein here. I mean a really close look. You are about to discover that Einstein was wrong and that he is STILL an idiot.
As are most physicists today.
Now, don't you feel smart?
If you don't see what I'm talking about, then look at the formula he just wrote in the photo. R(sub ik)=0. See it yet?
OK, I won't keep you in suspense. The formula basically says that there is nothing outside a Black Hole. You read that right. Nothing outside a Black Hole. In other words, according to Einstein's General Theory of Relativity, there is NO UNIVERSE outside a black hole. Just to make sure the point drives home, if a black hole exists anywhere in the Universe, then we are not here to talk about it.
Now, I know what you are thinking, "Dude, you don't have a doctorate in Physics and receive billions of dollars in grants to build LIGO machines and CERN machines and have never been nominated for a Nobel Prize."
Maybe not, but as an auto didact who doesn't believe anything coming out of the mouths of self-proclaimed "experts," I can certainly look it up. And I did. And I found a guy names Steven J. Crothers, who does have lots of letters after his name and can solve the equations that produce the answer R(sub ik)=0. An he clearly (even for dummies like me) shows that according to Einstein, we don't exist if black holes do.
So, who cares?
Well, you may have heard all the hoopla recently about the discovery of "gravity waves" by devices called LIGO in Washington State and Louisiana. "Oooh," they said, "Did you see that? It was caused by two black holes colliding and thus we just proved Einstein was right!"
I raised my hand. "Excuse me," I said, "But if you just proved Einstein right then we are not really here discussing colliding black holes and gravity waves." Everyone ignored me, of course, as they always do with kill-joys at big parties. Something like that would threaten all that juicy tax money flowing in.
I wasn't alone. Wal Thornhill, head thinker over at the Thunderbolts Project also caught the glaring problem. And he's a lot smarter than I am, too.
According to Wal, the LIGO instrument depends on having two very long tubes with LASERS shining down the centers of both to a collector in the center. The tubes are vacuumed out to the point of being much emptier than empty space - as in 'up there.' What they failed to tell everyone, and us everyones are thinking, "hey, that's pretty vacuous," is that nothing stops neutrinos.
Now, if you're not up to date on neutrinos, those are near-massless particles that can pass through the entire Earth without touching anything, as if it's not there. In fact, there are other machines in Italy, Japan and Antarctica - that cost billions of dollars too - to try and catch some neutrinos. In decades of operations, they've only managed to see a handful of them when by sheer chance, they hit a molecule of water and let out a little photon of blue light.
So, now you're probably thinking what I'm thinking, "Hey wait a minute, they spent billions on machines to detect particles that negate the findings of the other machines that found gravity waves?!" Yup, great minds think alike. See how smart we are?
I probably don't have to go much further here to get you to start wondering if all those idiots up there talking about gravity waves are con artists looking to generate a little more tax money to fund their Starbucks runs and probably a really big party celebrating how clever they were in fooling all us taxpayers.
The point here, and it's pretty important, is don't believe anyone who calls themselves an "expert," especially if their income is dependent on governments stealing money from us hard-working folks. They use all this high-falootin' language and scribble incomprehensible formulae (that's the real plural version) on black boards to bamboozle us into handing over more money so they can build bigger machines to make us think they know what they are talking about.
Hey, you know what? That sounds a lot like the way kings used to tax the crap out of us hard-working folks to build equally useless cathedrals back in the Middle Ages. Only difference is cathedrals were rather pretty and were open to common folk to come in and look around. It's not likely we could have the same privileges with the modern versions.
Our walking, talking and breathing might disturb the LASER gods inside the not-so-empty tubes.
Amazing what you can learn when you take a moment to do a little reading.
By the way, while I'm thinking about it, has anyone heard anything about the Ceres lights since the Dawn spacecraft reached its optimal (and closest) mapping orbit? Yeah, me neither.
As are most physicists today.
Now, don't you feel smart?
If you don't see what I'm talking about, then look at the formula he just wrote in the photo. R(sub ik)=0. See it yet?
OK, I won't keep you in suspense. The formula basically says that there is nothing outside a Black Hole. You read that right. Nothing outside a Black Hole. In other words, according to Einstein's General Theory of Relativity, there is NO UNIVERSE outside a black hole. Just to make sure the point drives home, if a black hole exists anywhere in the Universe, then we are not here to talk about it.
Now, I know what you are thinking, "Dude, you don't have a doctorate in Physics and receive billions of dollars in grants to build LIGO machines and CERN machines and have never been nominated for a Nobel Prize."
Maybe not, but as an auto didact who doesn't believe anything coming out of the mouths of self-proclaimed "experts," I can certainly look it up. And I did. And I found a guy names Steven J. Crothers, who does have lots of letters after his name and can solve the equations that produce the answer R(sub ik)=0. An he clearly (even for dummies like me) shows that according to Einstein, we don't exist if black holes do.
So, who cares?
Well, you may have heard all the hoopla recently about the discovery of "gravity waves" by devices called LIGO in Washington State and Louisiana. "Oooh," they said, "Did you see that? It was caused by two black holes colliding and thus we just proved Einstein was right!"
I raised my hand. "Excuse me," I said, "But if you just proved Einstein right then we are not really here discussing colliding black holes and gravity waves." Everyone ignored me, of course, as they always do with kill-joys at big parties. Something like that would threaten all that juicy tax money flowing in.
I wasn't alone. Wal Thornhill, head thinker over at the Thunderbolts Project also caught the glaring problem. And he's a lot smarter than I am, too.
According to Wal, the LIGO instrument depends on having two very long tubes with LASERS shining down the centers of both to a collector in the center. The tubes are vacuumed out to the point of being much emptier than empty space - as in 'up there.' What they failed to tell everyone, and us everyones are thinking, "hey, that's pretty vacuous," is that nothing stops neutrinos.
Now, if you're not up to date on neutrinos, those are near-massless particles that can pass through the entire Earth without touching anything, as if it's not there. In fact, there are other machines in Italy, Japan and Antarctica - that cost billions of dollars too - to try and catch some neutrinos. In decades of operations, they've only managed to see a handful of them when by sheer chance, they hit a molecule of water and let out a little photon of blue light.
So, now you're probably thinking what I'm thinking, "Hey wait a minute, they spent billions on machines to detect particles that negate the findings of the other machines that found gravity waves?!" Yup, great minds think alike. See how smart we are?
I probably don't have to go much further here to get you to start wondering if all those idiots up there talking about gravity waves are con artists looking to generate a little more tax money to fund their Starbucks runs and probably a really big party celebrating how clever they were in fooling all us taxpayers.
The point here, and it's pretty important, is don't believe anyone who calls themselves an "expert," especially if their income is dependent on governments stealing money from us hard-working folks. They use all this high-falootin' language and scribble incomprehensible formulae (that's the real plural version) on black boards to bamboozle us into handing over more money so they can build bigger machines to make us think they know what they are talking about.
Hey, you know what? That sounds a lot like the way kings used to tax the crap out of us hard-working folks to build equally useless cathedrals back in the Middle Ages. Only difference is cathedrals were rather pretty and were open to common folk to come in and look around. It's not likely we could have the same privileges with the modern versions.
Our walking, talking and breathing might disturb the LASER gods inside the not-so-empty tubes.
Amazing what you can learn when you take a moment to do a little reading.
By the way, while I'm thinking about it, has anyone heard anything about the Ceres lights since the Dawn spacecraft reached its optimal (and closest) mapping orbit? Yeah, me neither.
Labels:
Albert Einstein,
General Relativity,
gravity waves,
LIGO
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

