Oh boy, here we go again.
Yes! For the second time ever, a bunch of amorphous "scientists" have discovered something that doesn't exist, caused by something else that doesn't exist. And the information is presented as a fait accompli, there can be no question.
According to the article, this "discovery" is confirmed, without having published a single paper, passed peer review, or even having confirmed the underlying assumptions that gave birth to the idea. Even worse, older articles crow that this "discovery" proves Einstein's Theory of Relativity, even though Einstein never explained gravity, didn't like the idea of gravitational waves and rejected the whole thing as "spooky."
Here's the problem: no one has ever seen a black hole; they only exist in mathematical constructs. Furthermore, no one has a clue how or why gravity works, much less that it is a function of some mysterious substance called "space-time." Thus, without proof of the existence of black holes and without understanding even the most basic aspects of gravity, we can "discover" waves in "space-time" created by imaginary objects merging with each other. And the articles even come with nifty animations, as if someone has actually seen these things.
If you are a product on 20th century education, as I am, you were taught that space is swarming with black holes. Movies like Interstellar, The Black Hole and Event Horizon feed this myth, to the point that nearly all of us believe these things exist, because when was the last time you read the theories and proofs for black holes? That's what I thought.
There are four theories concerning the creation and existence of black holes. All four of them state that the Universe contains only one mass - the black hole. In other words, a black hole universe can only contain one black hole and nothing else. Yes, that's right, if a black hole exists, then all four theories state that nothing else - including us - exists.
Since we obviously exist, then black holes cannot. Simple reasoning.
Now, if black holes do not exist, then gravity waves propagated by two of them colliding cannot exist. First, there cannot be two black holes, according to theory. Second, they cannot collide. Third, gravity waves cannot propagate from them colliding.
We haven't even gotten to the part about gravity. Thing is, no one understands gravity. You know the picture of a ball sitting on a rubber sheet? That is a circular argument, because it needs gravity to pull the ball down to make a dent in the rubber sheet. Gravity creates gravity. HUH?
Go watch this video and see if you can make sense out of gravitational theory when you are done. Hell, even Newton couldn't do it, or wouldn't, take your pick.
So, now we've shot some big holes in black holes and gravity. How about these gravity waves?
The devices used to "detect" these waves are called LIGO. There is one in Washington State and one in Louisiana. That's roughly 2,000 miles apart (x1.6...you do the math for kilometers). Now these waves supposedly travel at the "speed of light" (another BS thing). However, the waves arrived at the two LIGO machines a couple of microseconds apart. So, waves travelling a billion light years (and spreading out the whole way) and travelling at the "speed of light" arrive at Washington and Louisiana at different times? Sorry, that blows the whole argument right there.
Go watch this video to destroy the whole argument.
There are some heavy hitters on the side of skepticism, and these guys have names, unlike the "scientists" who report the "discovery." This is not a bunch of cranks (like me) pointing out that this is all bullshit to justify the ungodly sums of money being spent on these massive toys, like LIGO.
So, no black holes, no gravity waves, no "space-time" medium, and something that no one understand (gravity). Does it sound to you like gravity waves have been "discovered?"
These toys may have found something, but it is not what is being reported, and in fact, I suspect no one really understands what was found, if anything.
What is certain is that these reports of definitive "discoveries" are open to wildly different interpretations and that the assumptions underlying the conclusions are completely vacuous. Not only is the quality of science reporting a load of manure, but the whole underpinnings of modern physics are based on mathematical constructs being presented as facts with no supporting proof.
That's right, folks, it's time to go back to the chalk board.
Here Thar Be Monsters!
From the other side of the argument to the other side of the planet, read in over 149 countries and 17 languages. We bring you news and opinion with an IndoTex® flavor. Be sure to check out the Home Site. Send thoughts and comments to bernard atradiofarside.com, and tell all your friends. Note comments on this site are moderated to remove spam. Sampai jumpa, y'all.
Showing posts with label LIGO. Show all posts
Showing posts with label LIGO. Show all posts
20.6.16
21.2.16
Einstein Is STILL An Idiot!
Take a good look at the photo of Einstein here. I mean a really close look. You are about to discover that Einstein was wrong and that he is STILL an idiot.
As are most physicists today.
Now, don't you feel smart?
If you don't see what I'm talking about, then look at the formula he just wrote in the photo. R(sub ik)=0. See it yet?
OK, I won't keep you in suspense. The formula basically says that there is nothing outside a Black Hole. You read that right. Nothing outside a Black Hole. In other words, according to Einstein's General Theory of Relativity, there is NO UNIVERSE outside a black hole. Just to make sure the point drives home, if a black hole exists anywhere in the Universe, then we are not here to talk about it.
Now, I know what you are thinking, "Dude, you don't have a doctorate in Physics and receive billions of dollars in grants to build LIGO machines and CERN machines and have never been nominated for a Nobel Prize."
Maybe not, but as an auto didact who doesn't believe anything coming out of the mouths of self-proclaimed "experts," I can certainly look it up. And I did. And I found a guy names Steven J. Crothers, who does have lots of letters after his name and can solve the equations that produce the answer R(sub ik)=0. An he clearly (even for dummies like me) shows that according to Einstein, we don't exist if black holes do.
So, who cares?
Well, you may have heard all the hoopla recently about the discovery of "gravity waves" by devices called LIGO in Washington State and Louisiana. "Oooh," they said, "Did you see that? It was caused by two black holes colliding and thus we just proved Einstein was right!"
I raised my hand. "Excuse me," I said, "But if you just proved Einstein right then we are not really here discussing colliding black holes and gravity waves." Everyone ignored me, of course, as they always do with kill-joys at big parties. Something like that would threaten all that juicy tax money flowing in.
I wasn't alone. Wal Thornhill, head thinker over at the Thunderbolts Project also caught the glaring problem. And he's a lot smarter than I am, too.
According to Wal, the LIGO instrument depends on having two very long tubes with LASERS shining down the centers of both to a collector in the center. The tubes are vacuumed out to the point of being much emptier than empty space - as in 'up there.' What they failed to tell everyone, and us everyones are thinking, "hey, that's pretty vacuous," is that nothing stops neutrinos.
Now, if you're not up to date on neutrinos, those are near-massless particles that can pass through the entire Earth without touching anything, as if it's not there. In fact, there are other machines in Italy, Japan and Antarctica - that cost billions of dollars too - to try and catch some neutrinos. In decades of operations, they've only managed to see a handful of them when by sheer chance, they hit a molecule of water and let out a little photon of blue light.
So, now you're probably thinking what I'm thinking, "Hey wait a minute, they spent billions on machines to detect particles that negate the findings of the other machines that found gravity waves?!" Yup, great minds think alike. See how smart we are?
I probably don't have to go much further here to get you to start wondering if all those idiots up there talking about gravity waves are con artists looking to generate a little more tax money to fund their Starbucks runs and probably a really big party celebrating how clever they were in fooling all us taxpayers.
The point here, and it's pretty important, is don't believe anyone who calls themselves an "expert," especially if their income is dependent on governments stealing money from us hard-working folks. They use all this high-falootin' language and scribble incomprehensible formulae (that's the real plural version) on black boards to bamboozle us into handing over more money so they can build bigger machines to make us think they know what they are talking about.
Hey, you know what? That sounds a lot like the way kings used to tax the crap out of us hard-working folks to build equally useless cathedrals back in the Middle Ages. Only difference is cathedrals were rather pretty and were open to common folk to come in and look around. It's not likely we could have the same privileges with the modern versions.
Our walking, talking and breathing might disturb the LASER gods inside the not-so-empty tubes.
Amazing what you can learn when you take a moment to do a little reading.
By the way, while I'm thinking about it, has anyone heard anything about the Ceres lights since the Dawn spacecraft reached its optimal (and closest) mapping orbit? Yeah, me neither.
As are most physicists today.
Now, don't you feel smart?
If you don't see what I'm talking about, then look at the formula he just wrote in the photo. R(sub ik)=0. See it yet?
OK, I won't keep you in suspense. The formula basically says that there is nothing outside a Black Hole. You read that right. Nothing outside a Black Hole. In other words, according to Einstein's General Theory of Relativity, there is NO UNIVERSE outside a black hole. Just to make sure the point drives home, if a black hole exists anywhere in the Universe, then we are not here to talk about it.
Now, I know what you are thinking, "Dude, you don't have a doctorate in Physics and receive billions of dollars in grants to build LIGO machines and CERN machines and have never been nominated for a Nobel Prize."
Maybe not, but as an auto didact who doesn't believe anything coming out of the mouths of self-proclaimed "experts," I can certainly look it up. And I did. And I found a guy names Steven J. Crothers, who does have lots of letters after his name and can solve the equations that produce the answer R(sub ik)=0. An he clearly (even for dummies like me) shows that according to Einstein, we don't exist if black holes do.
So, who cares?
Well, you may have heard all the hoopla recently about the discovery of "gravity waves" by devices called LIGO in Washington State and Louisiana. "Oooh," they said, "Did you see that? It was caused by two black holes colliding and thus we just proved Einstein was right!"
I raised my hand. "Excuse me," I said, "But if you just proved Einstein right then we are not really here discussing colliding black holes and gravity waves." Everyone ignored me, of course, as they always do with kill-joys at big parties. Something like that would threaten all that juicy tax money flowing in.
I wasn't alone. Wal Thornhill, head thinker over at the Thunderbolts Project also caught the glaring problem. And he's a lot smarter than I am, too.
According to Wal, the LIGO instrument depends on having two very long tubes with LASERS shining down the centers of both to a collector in the center. The tubes are vacuumed out to the point of being much emptier than empty space - as in 'up there.' What they failed to tell everyone, and us everyones are thinking, "hey, that's pretty vacuous," is that nothing stops neutrinos.
Now, if you're not up to date on neutrinos, those are near-massless particles that can pass through the entire Earth without touching anything, as if it's not there. In fact, there are other machines in Italy, Japan and Antarctica - that cost billions of dollars too - to try and catch some neutrinos. In decades of operations, they've only managed to see a handful of them when by sheer chance, they hit a molecule of water and let out a little photon of blue light.
So, now you're probably thinking what I'm thinking, "Hey wait a minute, they spent billions on machines to detect particles that negate the findings of the other machines that found gravity waves?!" Yup, great minds think alike. See how smart we are?
I probably don't have to go much further here to get you to start wondering if all those idiots up there talking about gravity waves are con artists looking to generate a little more tax money to fund their Starbucks runs and probably a really big party celebrating how clever they were in fooling all us taxpayers.
The point here, and it's pretty important, is don't believe anyone who calls themselves an "expert," especially if their income is dependent on governments stealing money from us hard-working folks. They use all this high-falootin' language and scribble incomprehensible formulae (that's the real plural version) on black boards to bamboozle us into handing over more money so they can build bigger machines to make us think they know what they are talking about.
Hey, you know what? That sounds a lot like the way kings used to tax the crap out of us hard-working folks to build equally useless cathedrals back in the Middle Ages. Only difference is cathedrals were rather pretty and were open to common folk to come in and look around. It's not likely we could have the same privileges with the modern versions.
Our walking, talking and breathing might disturb the LASER gods inside the not-so-empty tubes.
Amazing what you can learn when you take a moment to do a little reading.
By the way, while I'm thinking about it, has anyone heard anything about the Ceres lights since the Dawn spacecraft reached its optimal (and closest) mapping orbit? Yeah, me neither.
Labels:
Albert Einstein,
General Relativity,
gravity waves,
LIGO
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

