A Quantum of Q-bit

We want to express our sincerest thanks to Jeff Rense and his team for their invaluable support.  If this topic interests you, please keep an eye on the Rense Radio Network for exclusive content and updates as we ferret out the Q.

Previous posts:
Deep Throat v, Q
Q The Conspiracy - A Phenomenon
The Gospel According To Q
A-Marketing We Will Q
The Name Of The Q
Q The LARP Carp
Spe-Q-lating On Q
In The Twilight Of The Q
Jonesing For Q
Analyzing Q-Analysis

The Silence of the Q

The Q Prophesy
To Q Or Not To Q

UPDATE 17 Sept 2018 (coincidence?): It seems that David Wilcock and Jordan Sather are two of the biggest promoters, if not the originators, of the "51,000 sealed indictments" meme.  Regardless of who it comes from, it can easily be proven false.  That, however, would require using logic and reason, qualities in short supply among Q-vians.

1) The 51,000 includes all sealed cases found on PACER, which includes bankruptcies (majority of cases), family/juvenile court cases and appellate cases, none of which have anything to do with Q or indicting Deep State characters; in fact, most are not indictments at all.
2) The total number is cumulative, so the list is not being purged as cases are unsealed.
3) If we assume 6 grand jurors, a judge, 2 lawyers, the clerk, the bailiff, and assorted court personnel for EACH grand jury, we are looking at well over 500,000 people involved; do you honestly think ALL those people would be silent over such explosive information?
4) There are 94 Article III US District Courts, meaning each court has convened 543 grand juries in the past 9 months, or roughly 2/day without weekends or holidays; simply put, the US federal judicial system is doing nothing but convening grand juries, right?
5) The number of ACTUAL sealed indictments is around 1,000, and that number is well within the year-over-year average at the federal level.

It appears we can safely put this meme to bed and get back to reality - another quality in short supply on this topic.  Use logic.

How many times have we been told that Q is all about research?  Would be nice to see some once in a while.
================================================

I am not so full of myself that I think Q or any of the Q-vians would specifically address any of the points I've made over the past several months of analyzing the Q Phenomenon.  I'm just a fnutty blogger in the back woods of Borneo who spends way too much time reading, watching and thinking about something a great many people think is pure lunacy to begin with.

I will say that Q has put forth a great deal of effort taking Alex Jones down.  I still maintain that Jones was offered a vital role in all this back when he was deplatformed by YouTube and Facebook (see my article Jonesing for Q).  He was given a golden litigation task with a soon-to-be-friendly Supreme Court and Jones could have made judicial history by helping take down the Tech Giants.

Q2088

Instead, he blew it for ego because he knows Q is stealing his thunder and putting him out of business one way or another.  So, bye-bye Twitter too.  And Q is openly calling Jones a Mossad agent to boot (e.g. Q2088).

It should be noted that Q uses the three letters "MOS," which could have many interpretations, so Q has plenty of wiggle room if it wants to walk it back.  The Mossad interpretation is entirely on the heads of the Q-vians.

It is fascinating to me that a complete unknown, a faceless, nameless entity that showed up not even a year ago, has unseated Jones, who has worked feverishly for 20 years to build his empire.  What spell is Q creating over so many people?

All is not happy in the Qniverse (Q Universe).

I chose that term advisedly, because among its many layers, Q incorporates a kind of comic book superhero mythology - which I haven't discussed at length yet, as well as pro sports, while wrapping it up in a form similar to the excellent show Person of Interest.

Q has stated on several occasions that it will not abide anyone profiting off of the Phenomenon.  Q specifically targeted Jerome Corsi, who had new life breathed into his waning years as one of the first Q Decoders, but he was profiting nicely from the effort.  Now Corsi is receiving the tender mercies of Robert Mueller, as is Roger Stone, another Jones cohort who also spent a lot of time tearing down Q or distracting from it for money.

Perhaps that is one reason I have not been directly attacked: I sell nothing, charge nothing, advertise nothing.  I just watch, listen and learn - and report to you, the astute reader.

The Jones crew aren't the only ones.  There's some character named Micro Chip, and another named Jack Viscovich, who together claimed to have positive proof that Micro Chip was behind the "Q LARP" and had convinced Viscovich of that fact and that Chip was shutting down the enterprise - except that Q kept posting.

And one of those posts (Q2088 above) seems to have completely discredited Chip by showing that all Apple adverts for its products have the time 9:41, which coincidentally is the exact time stamp on Chip's screen shots "proving" that he created Q (see Q2122).

Blog Hit Count 16 Sept 2018

Interestingly, I have apparently been the beneficiary of someone's attempt to raise my blog to public awareness in search engines.  As mentioned in my previous article, my site received a regular set of pings over two days, averaging about 300/hour.  Once again this past week, the same thing happened, only this time it was 500/hour.  In addition, it appears to be signed.  Look at the imeage.  There are about 10 major peaks at 500, then a pause and another isolated peak at 1,000.  This might be interpreted as 10^100, or ten to the 100th power, or...a googol.  All of the hits came from google.com, and all were directed at the home page, not any particular article.  I don't believe I am imagining things.  Other, smarter people have seen it too, and none of us have ever seen anything like it.

The reader will forgive me if all this sounds like a cross between Tom Clancy and Michael Crichton novels.  It falls out naturally from watching the Q Phenomenon for a long period of time, and is certainly not discouraged by Q itself.

So, where do we stand in all this?  What is the Qniverse (my term) leading to?  Is this Q thing real or just a distraction - a LARP if you will?

Well, as I have stated many times, I think Q is real and has a real-world agenda and that it is definitely NOT a LARP created by a bunch of basement-dwellers with too much time on their hands.

In my professional opinion, with decades of media experience behind me, Q is a vastly complex and altogether new application of a mathematical system called q-analysis, used to define and study interaction between sets, defined for our purposes as humans in the real world.  In short, it is a marketing campaign of extraordinary power and sophistication linked to high-quality, high-resolution intelligence data at the government level.

I think Q was hatched by elements within the US government as a weapon against other elements who were perceived as getting too powerful.  Q recruited a compliant front man named Donald Trump, who himself is a master of marketing and perception.  I suspect Q is operating above Trump, and not the other way around.  Trump is simply the ring master, but not the circus.

At its most basic level, Q is out to preserve itself by maintaining a favorable environment in the Executive Branch of the US government.  This requires keeping Trump in office as long as needed to achieve its goals.  Thus, Q has as its basis an election campaign, where it is influencing sympathetic voters to action, retrieving lost voters and activating them again, and converting new voters.

Q achieves this by appearing to be all things to all people:

• For those with a sport mentality, it's the Black team versus the White team.  
• For those with a religious bent, it is bringing wrath and vengeance to an immoral and apostic world.  
• For the marketeers, its a self-writing story that sells to anyone and sustains merchandise sales and donations over and above just selling Trump gear and political campaigns alone.
• To the cloak-and-dagger world, it appears as an exciting spy thriller, with plot twists galore and changing allegiances at every turn.  
• For comic book fans, Q is the invincible yet underdog hero fighting for truth and justice and the American way.  
• For the militarily inclined, Q is the quintessential patriot and the flag-waving True Believer defending the government and Constitution against all enemies foreign and domestic.  
• For the bookish, Q is the ultimate research material, providing hours of busy work digging through archives and ancient texts for clues.
• And to the conspiracy minded, Q is the ultimate proof that everything they've believed for so long and against waves of ridicule is absolutely true and correct.

On the one hand, Q is the ultimate liberal tool, bringing together a diverse group of people who would otherwise not seem to be natural allies.

On the other hand, Q is the ultimate conservative, unwavering in patriotic fervor and advocating traditional values.

If the reader would consider all of these angles and all of their permutations and possibilities, he or she should begin to see why I am so fascinated with this operation.  It is incredibly complex and designed by masterful hands.

And I have to agree with Q on one particular point - censorship equals fear.  

Q has neatly placed the MSM/GeezerMedia in a box.  If they acknowledge Q, they risk sending waves of new followers to it.  If they ignore or ban Q (as with Reddit recently), they risk doing the same thing.

You've got to stand in awe at the complexity of Q's strategy.  Damned if they do, damned if they don't.

The future of Q may well be one of the most dramatic episodes in recent history, or it may be one of the most significant let-downs of all time.  There doesn't seem to be any middle ground in this Phenomenon.

Q has clearly painted a target on some heavy hitters: the Bush/Clinton cabal, the US Deep State, the Vatican and a number of foreign nations - indeed, the nefarious underworld of the entire planet.  That's no small target.

Q has set up the Q-vians (my term for followers) to either be on the forefront of one of the most magnificent clean-up operations ever devised, or to be shamed for life as having fallen for one of the greatest hoaxes ever perpetrated.  I cannot discern any middle ground.  It is an all-or-nothing game with incredible odds and some severe outcomes in any case.

My own stance on the matter, as I have recently elucidated, is that Q claims to have taken immoral actions (death of John McCain, destruction of surveillance assets, etc.), and I cannot condone any entity that asserts its intrinsic goodness when it is no better than the enemy it purports to fight.  I must therefore count myself among the anti-Q crowd, but for an entirely different set of reasons.

I agree with the initial, stated goal of Q, but I do not agree with the means.  Controlling people's thoughts and actions using methods that they do not fully understand nor perceive is immoral.  Taking a life without a clear and public set of reasons, and endangering millions and risking war to achieve one's ends is immoral - especially when the millions are not fully informed of what is going on, and thus unable to consent.

Q's message has evolved over time, starting with the assertion that criminal suspects are facing imminent arrest, to cleaning the entire world of evil.  Q appears to be manipulating this escalation to attract as many followers as possible for the obvious goal of keeping a political candidate in office for as long as possible.  That seems to me to be rather cynical and dangerous, as similar mass movements throughout history have not ended well.

I hope that my agenda here has been made abundantly clear.  I am attempting to inform and caution anyone who will listen that Q appears to be a highly sophisticated psy-op run by secretive elements within the US government and ostensibly marketing a political candidate and a slate of partisans from the several States.

I am not hawking books, T-shirts and paywalls, which I hope demonstrates the integrity of my efforts, though admittedly I hold out my hat to those willing to encourage my efforts as any street performer at a busy intersection might.

Q2141

We are now quite literally at the cross-roads.  Q has encouraged the Q-vians to expect big things in the next month leading up to the mid-term elections.  For their parts, the Q-vians have focused their attention on a circulating and growing list of fifty-thousand-plus "sealed indictments," which seems to be the Holy Grail of the Phenomenon.

It is clear to me that October is a make or break time for Q.  It must either produce publicly visible results, both in convictions and elected officials, or risk losing a great many folks who have pinned their hopes on real action.

The Put Up Or Shut Up moment is upon us.  In Q2141, Q clearly throws the gauntlet: "Shills shill; Patriots WIN."

Clearly a case of Where We Go One, We Go All, it seems.

Reality And The Anti-Solution

UPDATE: Photos purportedly showing the "sniper's nest" and arsenal have been "leaked."  It is important to note that none of the guns have more capacity than about 70-round magazines, yet audio recordings clearly indicated more than 100 rounds being fired in non-stop bursts.  This implies belt-fed machine guns, which are not seen in the photos.  Some folks have counted well over 2,000 rounds being fired, which without a belt-fed gun would leave piles of spent brass all over room and likely down on the street.  Clearly the photos are NOT of the actual sniper's nest, the crime scene has been manipulated, and/or there were multiple shooters in different locations.  The next question to ask is ballistics evidence matching rounds to rifles with a clear and believable chain of custody, which will likely never come. [end]

The Las Vegas shooting is a jaw-dropping tragedy.  I can't imagine being the family and friend of a victim.    It is quite bad enough being a detached observer some thousands of miles away.

What makes this tragedy (and the string of them that have come before) so much worse is that there is not a single "authority" figure involved that can be trusted.  The families of the victim can not now, nor will they ever receive a straight answer or a trustworthy investigation.  There is not one "authority" involved that hasn't been compromised and undermined in the past few decades.

Furthermore, with contemporary digital technology that can literally edit reality in real time (commonly called "augmented reality" or AR), not a single bit of video, photo or audio evidence can be trusted - even if the SOURCE is trustworthy.

In effect, no one will ever get a straight answer, groups will polarize over their scenarios, the true perpetrator(s) will continue obfuscating the timeline and evidence, and the end result will be decades - if not centuries - of speculation.

The fact of the matter is that despite whether Stephen Paddock was an accountant who went 'round the bend, or he was a patsy for a nefarious group of actors with an agenda, we will never know.  The "selfie" video of Paddock shooting from the room can easily be manufactured by digitally inserting a face over live video.  Surveillance cam footage from the casinos over the past 10 years could easily be manufactured.  Audio evidence of multiple shooters can easily be manipulated.  In fact, I can do all of that right here on my laptop with the various apps that I use for editing.

The primary investigative agency, the FBI, has been completely compromised since the Obama administration if not before.  The CIA is well-known for running operations like this for political agendas.  The mass media, well, after 2016, anyone that believes anything coming out of their TeeVees is beyond hope.  The US federal government has not been trustworthy since the founding of the country.  The documented use of "crisis actors" in "training" exercises that always seem to coincide with events like this make any scenario questionable.  And, as usual, the central figure who is said to have perpetrated the crime is dead, so no trial will ever present the facts to a jury in court.

Without an actual accused to try, the investigation can be manipulated in a thousand different directions, and the investigation can even be subverted and any narrative inserted, since no lawyers will ever have to present a case with evidence.

In the end, your guess is as good as mine, and the endless string of armchair investigators online are equally as valid (or not) as any other "authority".  It has taken more than 50 years to get the final documents released in the JFK assassination, and even then one of the critical volumes on the perpetrator has "vanished".  We must accept that we will never have a real, definitive answer to this mystery, as every source of information can be questioned.

We are left to believe our own lying eyes.  We can only trust what we can believe, and at this point, I believe no one and nothing.  I am thoroughly convinced that Stephen Paddock did not act alone, if he acted at all, and if he is in fact a real person, which I greatly doubt.  There were very likely multiple shooters, with some on the ground.  The amount of "salted" clues over the past year or so reinforces my conviction that this was yet another psy-op to manipulate people's perceptions, not to mention an occult human sacrifice to whatever gods the Hidden Bastards worship.

In the final analysis, I believe no one and nothing.  I can create my own scenario by looking for common threads within this story, and running through past events.  The symbols are apparent, the actors are obvious, and agenda is clear in my perspective.

It really doesn't matter what I believe to be the Truth.  I could publish my entire scenario and be just another voice out there with a conspiracy theory muddying the waters.  The gentle reader's thoughts and opinions are as valid as mine.

I find it useful to assume events like this are fabricated from beginning to end for whatever purposes the actors have.  In the best case scenario, the real story is high-jacked and manipulated to achieve the same ends.  Whether Stephen Paddock was a real accountant gone wild, or is a completely fabricated ghost identity on whom to place the blame makes no difference in the end.  The real story is that nothing coming from any source who/which calls itself an "authority" can be trusted in any way to deliver the truth.

The real lesson here is that all governments everywhere, and all their associated agencies, ministries and functionaries, cannot be trusted.  The only true authority is our own minds, and they must be guarded very carefully to prevent us from being manipulated.

Believe no one, trust nothing, and create counter-scenarios.

Paging Dr. Caligari

READER NOTE: for those enjoying our slightly different take on the Trump Revolution, be sure to follow us on Twit-ter (@RadioFarSide) and the Farcebook page (Life on the Far Side) for additional commentary and background stories.

It's been an exciting week here at the Far Side Global Headquarters (FSGHQ).  It's not often we get such enormous globules of juicy news like those served up the past few days.  One gets the sense that we have witnessed a major turning point in world events, though it is, 1) difficult to discern these things when one is in the middle of the events, and 2) it remains to be seen whether or not Trump will honor his promises, since he is holding his first-ever elected office.

We here at the FSGHQ would like to go on record right now to say that, sorry folks, Trump will be a major disappointment and probably a disaster.  To see our track record on this score, please check the 2008 archives, where we called Obama's legacy to the letter.  Though not on this blogsite, we did the same for Bush the Younger.  It's easy to do, just say the same thing about anyone who gets elected.  It will always be true, because the System cannot be repaired from the inside, regardless of the intentions of the person/people involved, but we already covered that earlier this week.

It seems appropriate at this point to recall a sign my dad had on his desk in the Texas Senate: "When you're up to your ass in alligators, it's hard to remember your first thought was to drain the swamp."

One comment we have encountered frequently of late is that, "Donald Trump is the MOST divisive presidential candidate EVAH!"  We surmise that history is not one of these folk's strong points, since George C. Wallace was not all that long ago.  It should also be noted that he was a Democrat.

If we sound like we have a bit of glee in our voice, then you would be reading between the lines correctly.  We love moments like this, when a major chunk of the world's population is stunned into silence - and no one was killed.  A rare moment indeed.

To us Far Siders, huddled deep in the jungles of Borneo, the truly amazing thing was not just Trump's win, but that the Republicans got majorities in the House and Senate, and took a good number of gubernatorial posts, as well.  This wasn't just a vote against Hillary, this was a complete repudiation of the Democrats and their agenda from top to bottom.  The stale old red/blue map hardly has a blue smudge on it.  Even some of the traditional Dem strongholds went red.

This wasn't a win, or a landslide, it was a rout.  This was a good, old fashioned "throw the bastards out" kind of election.  It was Nixon in 1972, although the election map looks a lot like 2008, with a couple of key states turned red.  Clearly, the Klinton Kampaign was counting on a repeat of 2008/2012.

What they hadn't counted on was two things: 1) Scandal Fatigue - a newly defined psychotic state in which voters are just fed the hell up with business as usual, and 2) Ma and Pa Kettle getting exceedingly tired of being shat upon by the System.  It would seem that there is an upper limit to how much Politically Correct Brain-Bashing the general population will take, and gay marriage, queer toilets and gun confiscation look to be the lines in the sand.

So, going forward, what can we expect?  I'm going to lose some people here, but stick with me for a moment.

When so many people are stunned by the results...and I mean 9/11 kind of stunned, and memes like "miracle" and "divine intervention" start cropping up in diverse places, my spidey sense starts tingling.  Folks, at the risk of sounding like a true tin-foil kind cap character here, suppose the Trump victory were a real psy-op, one which Trump himself may or may not be aware of, and one for which the clues have been dropping like flies since at least the summer conventions.

First of all, by every standard metric, Hillary should have won the election.  It was in the bag.  What wasn't covered by normal historical voting habits was covered by extensive vote fraud.  God knows there are enough videos out there about ballot-box stuffing and computerized vote switching.  But all the cloak-and-dagger stuff surrounding WikiLeaks, Dr. Steve Pieczenik and murdered DNC IT hackers just smacks of a psy-op within a psy-op.

This Steve Pieczenik character really disturbs me.  As Robert, one of our long-time readers and mind-blowing correspondents so aptly put it, the deep state has a spokesman now.  His sudden appearance in the closing days of the election, bearing tidings of "soft" coup/counter-coup within the ranks of the US government just smacks of psy-op.

What I'm trying to sputter out here is that suppose the Trump win were a "miracle," with "divine intervention" behind it.  In other words, suppose some faction of the deep state counter-rigged the election to ensure a Trump victory.  In fact, suppose Trump's entire meteoric rise to political stardom and one of the first presidencies since the Revolutionary War days without ANY prior political experience was completely manufactured by some group in order to achieve some goal.

Let's imagine for a moment that Trump is completely unaware of all this.  Instinctively, I believe he is, or rather was until the last few days.  He probably actually thought he was achieving all this on his own volition, but at some level he must be thinking, "What the fuzz was that?"  For the moment, I have to assume he is ignorant because this scenario spins rapidly out of hand if I don't.

The scenario I have built in my head is that Hillary truly represented some nefarious faction that was truly mounting its final take-over of the US government.  This is not far-fetched, since I already believe that Hillary's private server(s) were purposely completely unprotected to give certain groups unfettered access to all the juicy information stored thereon.  I further believe that at least one of the groups given access were the bankster class, who used inside info to rig and hedge markets in their favor, and that Hillary's outrageous "speaking fees" were actually a relatively innocuous means of paying her a cut of the profits from such dealings.

Among the (apparently) many groups who had access to the Hillary Server would have been nearly every group of spooks with any technical savvy on the face of the Earth.  Though the American electorate and the US Congress weren't able to get access to her email, just about every other government on Earth had copies of the Hillary files.  This would have alarmed a significant number of folks in the deep state, both because of her cavalier handling of secrets, but also because of the who/why behind it.

Even before Hillary announced her candidacy, a rather foregone conclusion to anyone conscious, the revelations of her inside dealings began to leak out, with the New York Times picking up the story on 2 March 2015.  From there, the story snowballed, with investigations running in all directions.  However, when the FBI/DOJ openly colluded to clear Hillary of wrong-doing, the WikiLeaks started up, and Julian Assange has made it murkily clear that the leaks were coming from within the US intelligence community, of which there are 17 discrete agencies.

The DNC/Hillary cabal appear to have mistakenly thought that an IT staffer was behind all the email leaks, and rubbed him out.  This hit might have also been a warning to whomever else was involved that you better stop now.  Didn't work, obviously because the real leakers knew that the DNC/Hillary cabal were on the wrong track.

Regardless of why the staffer got waxed, the DNC/Hillary cabal thought they had shut it down.  Just to be sure, though, they had shut down the FBI investigation a few days before and had James Comey publicly announce, "That's all, folks!"  In effect, it was a big "move along folks, nothing to see here."

Well, that didn't kill the story, because several branch offices of the FBI and NYPD didn't stop their investigation.  They were sitting on a treasure trove of 600,000 email found on the laptop of Hillary's closest adviser's husband's laptop.  They had to shut that down too, so once again Comey was wheeled out to "reopen" the investigation, and then one week later shut it down again, with another more ephatic "MOVE ALONG!"

At exactly that moment, this character Steve Pieczenik popped up claiming to, in effect, be the spokesman for the deep state.  He proceeded to fire-bomb the internet with all kinds of wild inferences regarding the inner workings of the DNC/Hillary cabal.  At the same time, WikiLeaks let go of some of its juiciest tidbits, revealing the long-suspected child-sex ring that operates internationally at the highest levels of power (it's a means of ensuring loyalty among the elites).

Meanwhile, all the polls, and I mean the public and private ones, had Hillary winning.  She had done remarkable work installing her network of fraud in the election system and the polls were designed to carefully steer folks to assume that her win on election day was a foregone conclusion that everyone was aware of through voter sampling.  Hell, even the EXIT POLLS were wrong!  Hillary's cabal must have figured out something was up, though, because they cancelled the celebratory fireworks the day before the election.

For all intents and purposes, the election appears to have been rigged, but not in the way that everyone thought it would be.  The Soros-owned voting machines were carefully programmed to give the desired response, but in a show of technical bravado, the deep state had hacked the hack, and carefully seeded a Trump victory into the returns.

That's right, folks, it was an op within an op within an op.  The coup conspirators thought they had successfully pulled off yet another stolen election, only to find that the stolen election had been stolen.  Honestly, is it more plausible that the gods personally steered the election results, or that various factions within the deep state are at war and out-maneuvering each other in cyberspace?

You can see why I have to believe Trump is ignorant, or at least just now figuring this out, because the scenario gets really nasty really quickly once you start figuring in his complicity.  And it gets worse the farther back in time you assume he was actively involved.

What is really worrisome now is that Hillary's concession speech was too measured, too cool, too calm.  Someone who has spent 40 years carefully crafting her image and weaseling into the inner circles of power doesn't just quietly and calmly go into oblivion.  No, she has at least one solid back-up plan, and we ain't seen her end game yet.

My biggest question now is not whether or how it was done.  That much seems obvious to me, at least.  No, the Big Question is what exactly are the motives of the counter-coup faction(s)?

Yes folks, all the indications are that we have tumbled down a very deep rabbit hole and the slow war that has been brewing behind the scenes since at least the JFK assassination is finally spilling over into the daylight.  Whether you believe in conspiracies or not, you have to admit that divine intervention and miraculous victories are better explained as coup/counter-coup.

Reader Robert chose an even better, if a bit more arcane metaphor.  He selected the 1920 German film Das Cabinet des Doktor Caligari as his framework for understanding whatever just happened.  I must say I can't think of a better one.

Doc, we have a Code Blue!