At more or less the same time, I have discovered a YouTube channel and a movement that I truly respect.
The YouTube channel is Lauren Southern, and it begs the question, why are all the hot babes on the good side? Lauren says what every sane person should be thinking. She takes on the tough topics and is unafraid to go there, challenging all the sacred cows of the Post-Modernist Marxists, confronting them with camera and microphone at the ready.
Lauren Southern introduced me to a group that is quickly rising in my esteem. The group is called Génération Identitaire, or Generation Identity, and they are literally putting it all on the line to defend history and culture from Neo-Fascist invasion and governmental collusion.
Lauren's passionate report on the willful destruction of New Orleans landmarks made me weep for the loss of history, while at the same time enraged me. Her on-the-spot reports from Paris just before the election brought me images and reports that the StreetMeat Media will not ever show us.
And of course her report on Generation Identity filled me with hope that a younger generation will not roll over and allow Western civilization to be destroyed.
This young woman has more moxy than most of the men I have ever known. She is of the right age, intelligence and temperament to inspire the generation that mine left dangling in the wind. It inspires me to watch her videos.
When I watch Generation Identity in action, I remember fondly my days as an activist with the Texas secessionist movement. I was ridiculed and dismissed and even had my former life destroyed by a political system dead set on destroying my cultural heritage. I spent many hours in jail, as well as driving all over the countryside to deliver and listen to speeches.
I was often accused of being a racist because of my activities, but were forced to eat their words when they realized I was married to an Apache-Latina, spoke multiple languages, and had traveled to dozens of countries - not as a tourist, but as someone genuinely interested in the history and culture.
It makes me misty-eyed to see these young folks training, fighting and taking action, while us old farts sit around and grouse.
When I rail against Islam, it is not the real Islam that named most of the visible stars in the northern hemisphere, or gave the world algebra, or bequeathed the world a rich heritage of art and architecture. The Islam I rail against is a perverted form of rigid fundamentalist dogmas that has gotten loose - an unintended consequence of Western powers who saw it as a weapon. It is anti-art, anti-philosophy and anti-reason. It is fascistically dogmatic and unyielding in its error.
It is no different than the Catholic Church during the Middle Ages, with its destruction of "pagan" temples, pogroms against science and Holy Inquisitions, and even in our own age supported Nazism.
Real tolerance and real diversity means that every culture has the intrinsic right to a space where it can grow on its own, or die of its own folly. Good, bad or indifferent, though, every culture and must be allowed to grow, dominate, merge, or die off as the organic structure that it is.
What we are seeing, though, is artificial mixing that is catalyzing a war to be used as a distraction for a particular agenda. This cultural war - a world war if you like - is part of the classic Hegelian Dialectic: create a problem and install a chosen solution by controlling the discourse. As the poles calcify, the outcome becomes inevitable, since the destroyers of culture are relentless, and the defenders of culture have no choice but to answer with equal force.
Since one side cannot talk and the other side cannot listen, the inevitable result must be all-out war. At the end of that war, whatever the final result, those with the agenda will say we must do something to stop these wars, and oh by the way, here's our pre-formulated plan to do just that. Rest assured that the Final Solution will be just as abhorrent as the war itself, though perhaps less chaotic and bloody.
Individuals like Lauren Southern and groups like Generation Identity are likely the West's last-ditch effort to stop the march to war and the destruction of history and culture. The open questions are, is it in time, and is it enough? It depends a lot on who listens and how well they can remain focused on the real goal.
As is often the result, people like Lauren are bought off by the corporate interests and groups like GI are infiltrated and steered the wrong direction. Let us hope and pray that they have the integrity, strength and will to stay on the Path, and more importantly, that others will join them in the fight.
The most important tools they, and we have at our disposal are books. We must read the ancient foundations of our civilization and take the lessons of those before us to heart. It is not the first time our civilization has faced these challenges, nor will it be the last, but it is the challenge we have in front of us. It is incumbent on Muslims, Christians, Atheists, and everyone else, to see where we have been before choosing where we will go.
Here Thar Be Monsters!
From the other side of the argument to the other side of the planet, read in over 149 countries and 17 languages. We bring you news and opinion with an IndoTex® flavor. Be sure to check out the Home Site. Send thoughts and comments to bernard atradiofarside.com, and tell all your friends. Note comments on this site are moderated to remove spam. Sampai jumpa, y'all.
Showing posts with label clash of civilizations. Show all posts
Showing posts with label clash of civilizations. Show all posts
15.5.17
9.1.17
Department Of Repeated Redundancies Department
Let's start with the headline that gobbled up the weekend news cycle - the Fort Lauderdale airport shooting. A man, known to "authorities" to be unstable, transports a rifle and ammunition in his baggage from Alaska to Florida, but is apparently not registered on any flight arriving there. He takes his baggage to the toilet, loads up and comes out shooting. Then the "authorities" announce that they are questioning the suspect, which would seem like a logical thing to do. Meantime, the entire government-controlled corporate media debate focuses on adding more of the same policies and procedures that have failed time and time again.
Either the government "authorities" are completely and utterly lobotomized (and let's include their mouthpieces as well), or they think the average American is. I suspect it is a generous helping of both.
Next headline: Indonesia wants to boost its defense industry by making and exporting bombs that could potentially be thrown back at them. Now, to a thinking person, you would want to make and store bombs for defense, not sell them to potential enemies. Furthermore, the Indonesian government wants to boost its defense by continuing to disarm and distrust its own citizens/slaves.
If anyone asked me, which they obviously didn't, I wouldn't be selling my bombs and I would arm and train every able-bodied (and minded) citizen, so that an invader would have to fight door-to-door across thousands of islands in order to take over the country.
But that's just me thinking again.
How about this one: government wizards (a.k.a. "scientists") say they have witnessed a Black Hole tear apart a star and spit the pieces out into space. In the same freaking article, they say Black Holes gobble up everything and not even light can escape. Um...maybe I'm missing something here, but didn't you just tell me that this Black Hole is "spitting" pieces of a star out into space?
Maybe nobody reads this shit, because I seem to be the only one thinking these things are just a bit contradictory.
Trump says anyone who doesn't want better relations with Russia is a "fool" and "really stupid." Pardon me, Mr. President-Elect, isn't that why folks elected you? I mean, it's a bit redundant to keep telling us what we already know. How about solutions? What exactly are Tillerson and the Evil Mass-Murdering Bastard War Criminal Kissinger doing to alleviate the problem?
Next, we have the climate. Yes, for some reason Al Gore and the Echoettes are sticking to the story that the Earth is suffering from man-made global warming, even though the world is cooling, there are record low temperatures and snowfall all over both hemispheres, polar ice is expanding, and rainfall patterns in both hemispheres are beginning to match perfectly with past solar Grand Minima. And just to put a cherry on the ice cream, polar bear populations are at record highs.
Still not convinced we've fallen down the rabbit hole?
The Democrats in the US absolutely insist that the Russians hacked the election, even though Julian Assange says emphatically that WikiLeaks did not get the email from the Russians, Seth Rich - DNC IT specialist - was shot dead in the back in broad daylight and NOT robbed, none of the "intelligence" agencies can produce a shred of evidence, and the Russians have no objective motivation to do so that outweighs the risk of getting caught doing it. Oh, and did we mention that the voting infrastructure of the US is not connected to the internet, and thus can't be hacked by typical means?
In the 1940s, the CIA was created out of some Nazi left-overs and General Galen's spook network in Europe and North Africa. In the 1950s, the CIA took over the Corporate Media with Project Mockingbird. In 1963, the CIA assassinated John Kennedy, who refused to follow the spook script and was preparing a full-on assault on their growing power and influence. Since then, the CIA has virtually ruled the Executive Branch of the US government, and through organizations like USAID, have set up networks in dozens of countries to control and influence those governments, as well.
So convinced was the CIA that it could install its next-in-line lackey, Hillary Clinton, that they profoundly underestimated the amount of vote flipping and ballot stuffing needed to ensure Trump, whom they have assiduously painted as a buffoon, would not get in. Perhaps they overestimated the somnolent effect they were having on the general public, or they grossly underestimated the number of people who were slowly but inexorably waking up from the 50-year hibernation of reason.
Even though the masses truly did elect Trump, and he is the first president that is not under the direct control of the CIA since 23 November 1961, he is nevertheless controlled by a competing faction of the Deep State, knowingly or not, though I think the former.
The US, and by extension the world, is slowly waking up from a decades-long trance that was achieved in part by the US victory and subsequent economic dominance in the world after World War 2, as well as the fact that so many US males were brainwashed by military service during that war into blind obedience to government and symbols.
The Grand Awakening is due to two primary factors: 1) the 50-year effort of independent researchers to undo the magic spell over the population, which used to be called the underground media, but which was emerged as the Alt Media (or Free Press as I prefer), and 2) the human mind can only take so much rewiring and layers of bullshit before it reboots. We are in the reboot phase of history at this very moment.
It is also a particularly vulnerable point. When the mind reboots, there is a time while the OS is loading that one can access the BIOS and change the system parameters. This is what we see with the "Russian hacking" narrative. The spooks are desperately trying to reinstall the "fear factor" before things get too far out of hand.
What makes all of this visible is the failure of the classic "black is white" operation that has gripped Western civilization for half a century. When the flip-flop narrative becomes this obvious, then it is clear that the spell has failed and people are clearly not buying the brute-force attempt to make them believe things that are clearly in conflict with the senses and basic reason.
In so many ways, the institutions of control, such as religion and government, are losing their power over the masses. The Big Three Monotheisms - Judaism, Christianity, Islam - which have enjoyed millennia of control, both directly and through their secular government counterparts, are falling apart. All of the war mongering we see is these institutions attempting to drive everyone back into nationalistic, and by extension religious mindsets. This is the real hegemony that has dominated the world for longer than any of us care to imagine.
The classic "black is white" narrative is nothing more than dressed-up "faith." Religions have inspired fanatical loyalty by spinning fantastical tales that prevent people from thinking or acting independently by deferring everything to sometime after death when the evil-doers will get theirs, or by waiting futilely for a Messiah who will come to set everything right. This deference is a poison that destroys critical thinking and creates bovine nose-to-tail herd behavior.
For three centuries now, the Enlightenment has sought to re-awaken the pre-frontal lobes of mass humanity by destroying the "black is white" narrative and the institutions that spin it.
The problem is that a part of the Enlightenment was corrupted and instead sought to take over the institutions of control. The reasoning that led to the perversion is rather convoluted, but suffice it to say that they figured they could use the control structure to reprogram humanity in their own image. This is where the Illuminati storyline comes from.
Fortunately, is seems that the true Enlightenment has survived underground and has been busily working to spark the Great Re-Awakening, a process that quite obviously the US Founding Fathers had hoped to achieve with their New Republic, the Shining City Upon The Hill.
Despite herculean efforts on the part of the ancient Controllers and the splinter group called the Illuminati, the Enlightenment has rooted and is just now starting to bear fruit. But it is a dangerous time. Entrenched and power-hungry organizations do not relinquish power without a fight, and that fight has only begun.
There is a covert war going on just out of sight, but it is increasingly visible to the masses. Ultimately, it will become an all-out war in which the ensconced powers will win or leave nothing but scorched Earth behind. It is a war of profound ideologies whose prize is nothing short of an entire planet. The one weakness of the Good Guys is that they want to prevent the scorched Earth and so are unwilling to go to the extremes that the Bad Guys are.
The next few years will be a true spectacle, even for all its gory destruction and waste. The clash of two completely and utterly incompatible philosophies will be nothing less than cataclysmic, though it must be said that not all of it will be fought in the real world - most of it will be mental and spiritual.
If you want to see what the other side is capable of, just look at the post-election mayhem in the US. Black teenagers streaming vile hate and complete lack of compassion on Farcebook. Paid rioters looting and destroying neighborhoods and randomly killing passers-by. This sociopathic violence and mindless destruction is only a tiny taste of what the Bad Guys will unleash to keep their privileged perches.
The Good Guys are neither mentally nor spiritually prepared for the hell that is coming. Far too many people believe that electing a few representatives is enough to fix the problem, when it is in fact the very heart of the problem to begin with.
People like Trump are not the solution, though they are symptomatic of the correct instinct on the part of the masses. He also represents to a great many people the power that they truly have, though when Trump fails - and he will - there is a terrible risk of despair and hopelessness on the part of the newly awakening masses. At that point, they will be most susceptible to re-immersion into the control grid.
Both sides have now fired their first volleys, though the Bad Guys know how far they will go to protect their domain. The Good Guys need to wise up fast and steel the mind and soul for the battle to come. We have a brief moment for a little R&R, but it is dangerous to let one's guard down.
Black is White...War is Peace...Hate is Love.
Labels:
black is white,
clash of civilizations,
Enlightenment,
history,
war
25.6.16
Dawn Of Personhood,Part 1
We had several major geo-political tremors this week. As I write this (Friday), it looks like Brexit is in the lead by less than a million votes. Can't cut it much finer than that, and I still don't believe it will happen, regardless of the vote. Too much riding on it.
There's the story about Obama getting his Executive Orders handed back to him, as well. Nothing could make me happier. The president of the US has gotten too sloppy and lazy with these EOs. The country doesn't have a king or a dictator (yet), or so it seems after the Supreme Court ruling. It also shuts down the wholesale importation of immigrants and all the amnesty rubbish. Still, a lot remains to be determined when it comes to presidential powers and Obama's determination to destroy American culture. Honestly, if the country wants to give itself away, why not hand it back to the folks who were the original inhabitants? But then, those cultures have long been destroyed, as well.
Out of all the big stories, though, the biggest comes from the EU parliament, and it has nothing to do with Brexit. It has everything to do with robots and may go a long way to kick-starting a conversation that should have started a long time ago.
Topic: What do we do when machines take all the jobs?
In short, the EU has decided to give "electronic personhood" to robots, to include certain rights and obligations, such as copyright on intellectual property, the use of money in exchange and the need to pay taxes. In effect, the EU has extended the rights of corporations to individual machines, known commonly as robots.
In case you haven't kept up your law degree for some time, the legal term "person" is a non-corporeal being created by the State, which has rights and obligations similar to corporeal citizens. Keep in mind, too, that a citizen is a living being, though not necessarily a human. In maritime law, a corporeal being is generally referred to as a "soul," which distinguishes it from cargo and other valuables.
The legal terminology is very convoluted, but suffice it to say that the EU has effectively imbued robots with individual identity and freedom.
Of the major news stories this week, I think this will have effects long after everyone has forgotten Obama or Brexit. We are talking decades if not centuries will be affected by this decision. It's that important.
As I've discussed here many times, corporate entities are a very old concept in Western law. Unlike Asia, where officers and employees are individually liable for the actions of the whole, the Western concept separates the corporation from the individuals who make it up. The concept is rooted in the theology surrounding Matthew 18:20, "For where two or more are gathered in my name, there too am I," or variations to that effect. Thus, the Roman Church became an entity unto itself, wholly separate from the individuals who make it up, and as Western law evolved, corporations became the secular version of the Church.
To distinguish what are known as "legal fictions," such as corporations, they were termed "persons" under the law, as opposed to "human beings." A "person" could have self-determination and own property, but it didn't have a "soul" or a "conscience." Thus, the person had to be completely controlled and regulated by the State, since its actions may constitute a hazard that a human being might avoid by virtue of a conscience.
In modern Western societies, even human beings have been turned into persons, often referred to as "straw men" by so-called conspiracy theorists, so that the State could have the "right" to regulate and control every aspect of our lives - a concept deeply foreign to older ways of thinking, but which took hold in US law in the first half of the 20th century.
By granting robots "electronic personhood," the EU has created a new class of "person" that will at least have many of the legal characteristics of a corporation. It would have the right to autonomy within the limits of the law. It would be able to create and own property. It would be empowered to operate in the economy as an individual, and it would have to pay taxes.
Where things get a bit murky is how those taxes would be allocated. Some would pay into what amounts to an insurance pool to cover damages and liabilities incurred by robot persons. It would also feed the State with its labor, much as humans do now. It would, though still controversial, also pay into a fund to guarantee a minimal income to humans displaced by robots in the workforce.
Humans displaced by technology is nothing new. The invention and widespread use of cars led to the near extinction of blacksmiths and livery stables. Jethro Tull's harvester put thousands of farmers out of business and led to the rise of agribusiness. Autolooms and sewing machines put thousands of seamstresses and weavers out of work. Even the electric light bulb led to the demise of the lamp-lighter.
However, in most cases one innovation killed one class of jobs, but led to new ones. Printers became pressmen. Blacksmiths became mechanics. Cobblers became shoe-repairmen, and so on.
What do you do when a machine is capable of replacing an entire human being?
An interesting and impending philosophical question.
How do you compete with a "person" that never needs a smoke break or a meal, never gets sick or pregnant, works 24/7 without a vacation or even sleep time, can be amortized as a capital investment, and can be taught a new task in seconds - even able to analyze and improve it functions as it goes?
We are staring down the barrel of the end of all jobs everywhere for all time. On the one hand, that could mean that humans will finally be free to pursue self-improvement and self-actualization. More than likely, though, given humanity's track record, it will lead to the vast majority of humans descending into abject poverty, death and misery.
Basically, it creates two entirely separate cultures. Since humans would never allow themselves to obsolete that way, they will reject everything automated and create a new economy This would obviously create an elite class that would no longer depend on the rest of us, and who would likely pursue a different course.
So, how would this play out?
That is a very interesting question, and now that I've set up the scenario, you'll have to wait for Part 2 to play the "What If" game. We are likely seeing all the pieces in motion right now. The question becomes, when will the hammer drop?
PART 2
There's the story about Obama getting his Executive Orders handed back to him, as well. Nothing could make me happier. The president of the US has gotten too sloppy and lazy with these EOs. The country doesn't have a king or a dictator (yet), or so it seems after the Supreme Court ruling. It also shuts down the wholesale importation of immigrants and all the amnesty rubbish. Still, a lot remains to be determined when it comes to presidential powers and Obama's determination to destroy American culture. Honestly, if the country wants to give itself away, why not hand it back to the folks who were the original inhabitants? But then, those cultures have long been destroyed, as well.
Out of all the big stories, though, the biggest comes from the EU parliament, and it has nothing to do with Brexit. It has everything to do with robots and may go a long way to kick-starting a conversation that should have started a long time ago.
Topic: What do we do when machines take all the jobs?
In short, the EU has decided to give "electronic personhood" to robots, to include certain rights and obligations, such as copyright on intellectual property, the use of money in exchange and the need to pay taxes. In effect, the EU has extended the rights of corporations to individual machines, known commonly as robots.
In case you haven't kept up your law degree for some time, the legal term "person" is a non-corporeal being created by the State, which has rights and obligations similar to corporeal citizens. Keep in mind, too, that a citizen is a living being, though not necessarily a human. In maritime law, a corporeal being is generally referred to as a "soul," which distinguishes it from cargo and other valuables.
The legal terminology is very convoluted, but suffice it to say that the EU has effectively imbued robots with individual identity and freedom.
Of the major news stories this week, I think this will have effects long after everyone has forgotten Obama or Brexit. We are talking decades if not centuries will be affected by this decision. It's that important.
As I've discussed here many times, corporate entities are a very old concept in Western law. Unlike Asia, where officers and employees are individually liable for the actions of the whole, the Western concept separates the corporation from the individuals who make it up. The concept is rooted in the theology surrounding Matthew 18:20, "For where two or more are gathered in my name, there too am I," or variations to that effect. Thus, the Roman Church became an entity unto itself, wholly separate from the individuals who make it up, and as Western law evolved, corporations became the secular version of the Church.
To distinguish what are known as "legal fictions," such as corporations, they were termed "persons" under the law, as opposed to "human beings." A "person" could have self-determination and own property, but it didn't have a "soul" or a "conscience." Thus, the person had to be completely controlled and regulated by the State, since its actions may constitute a hazard that a human being might avoid by virtue of a conscience.
In modern Western societies, even human beings have been turned into persons, often referred to as "straw men" by so-called conspiracy theorists, so that the State could have the "right" to regulate and control every aspect of our lives - a concept deeply foreign to older ways of thinking, but which took hold in US law in the first half of the 20th century.
By granting robots "electronic personhood," the EU has created a new class of "person" that will at least have many of the legal characteristics of a corporation. It would have the right to autonomy within the limits of the law. It would be able to create and own property. It would be empowered to operate in the economy as an individual, and it would have to pay taxes.
Where things get a bit murky is how those taxes would be allocated. Some would pay into what amounts to an insurance pool to cover damages and liabilities incurred by robot persons. It would also feed the State with its labor, much as humans do now. It would, though still controversial, also pay into a fund to guarantee a minimal income to humans displaced by robots in the workforce.
Humans displaced by technology is nothing new. The invention and widespread use of cars led to the near extinction of blacksmiths and livery stables. Jethro Tull's harvester put thousands of farmers out of business and led to the rise of agribusiness. Autolooms and sewing machines put thousands of seamstresses and weavers out of work. Even the electric light bulb led to the demise of the lamp-lighter.
However, in most cases one innovation killed one class of jobs, but led to new ones. Printers became pressmen. Blacksmiths became mechanics. Cobblers became shoe-repairmen, and so on.
What do you do when a machine is capable of replacing an entire human being?
An interesting and impending philosophical question.
How do you compete with a "person" that never needs a smoke break or a meal, never gets sick or pregnant, works 24/7 without a vacation or even sleep time, can be amortized as a capital investment, and can be taught a new task in seconds - even able to analyze and improve it functions as it goes?
We are staring down the barrel of the end of all jobs everywhere for all time. On the one hand, that could mean that humans will finally be free to pursue self-improvement and self-actualization. More than likely, though, given humanity's track record, it will lead to the vast majority of humans descending into abject poverty, death and misery.
Basically, it creates two entirely separate cultures. Since humans would never allow themselves to obsolete that way, they will reject everything automated and create a new economy This would obviously create an elite class that would no longer depend on the rest of us, and who would likely pursue a different course.
So, how would this play out?
That is a very interesting question, and now that I've set up the scenario, you'll have to wait for Part 2 to play the "What If" game. We are likely seeing all the pieces in motion right now. The question becomes, when will the hammer drop?
PART 2
Labels:
AI,
clash of civilizations,
legal persons,
robots,
technology
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)


