There are signs and portends that something amazing is about to go down in America. By "amazing," I don't mean the weak, Madison Ave. version, as in "amazing white sale at Bed Bath & Beyond," I mean like seeing a flock of flying elephants.
The ruling oligarchs appear not only to be having their usual turf wars, but for those turf wars to spill over into the public sphere in a way that will be amazing (flock of elephants).
America, at least in the sense of the ruling class, consists of the authoritarian/enforcement wing that uses guns and jails to ensure complete compliance, and the propaganda wing known as Hollywood. They are not mutually independent or exclusive. Each element of the oligarchy owns some part of both wings. Any other divisions, such as political parties, visible in the public sphere, are for public consumption and have no reality on Olympus.
There are three things going on that make me think something amazing is coming: Harvey Weinstein, the Russian Investigation, and the Las Vegas Massacre. Each of these events show a different aspect of the internal war that will soon bring down the entire turkey shoot.
Harvey Weinstein, as an individual, is nothing. In Hollywood, he is probably somewhere in the middle of the sexual predator range. Hollywood is nothing but sexual predators - males, females and undecidedes. I know from personal experience that the only reason most people have any interest in working in that industry is to get laid, or they are well prepared to do whatever it takes to get ahead in the industry. There are no illusions and no one is unaware of how the game is played.
Weinstein is a monster, but in a roomful of monsters, he hardly stands out. What he is, is a human sacrifice - an amputation that is attempting to stop something worse. He is the latest in a string of sacrifices trying to stop a massive implosion. Bill Cosby, Bill O'Reilly, Roman Polansky, Darryl Zanuck, Louis Mayer (MGM anyone?), Arthur Freed, Michael Winner, and Buddy Adler are just some of the names publicly outed, but the scandals date back to the 1920s and the earliest days of Hollywood.
The question becomes, whose Wheaties did he piss in to make him the human sacrifice du jour?
Next comes the whole Russia Fiasco that has gripped the US for well over a year, or at least gripped the flapping-jaw housepets of the oligarchs. Beginning with the so-called Russian Dossier and Hillary Clinton's attempt to undermine Donald Trump's administration with accusations of collusion with Russian agents, it is becoming increasingly clear that the collusion is on the wrong foot.
In 2009, Clinton, Mueller, Lynch, and Holden (all names familiar to US politics fans) were part of the Obama administration. They worked together to surreptitiously sell 20% of the country's strategic uranium supply to Russia, cover up the sale, and personally benefit from the proceeds, with the Clinton Foundation of Canada (no reporting requirements) receiving something on the order of $150 million.
Furthermore, the infamous Russian ads run on Facebook and Google were all for liberal causes, like Black Lives Matter. The appearance here is that part of the uranium deal was Russia's support for Clinton's campaign, not Trump's, though the Russian's likely tried to put members of Trump's inner circle in compromising positions that could be used for political fodder.
The plot thickens.
Then, there's the Las Vegas Massacre. Anyone with an ounce of sense and 30 minutes of reading time can figure out that this event was a "false flag" attempting to smear the Trump administration and wrestle the political agenda away from the coming Flood.
Las Vegas has failed miserably. The federal agencies involved are in a complete panic trying to bend the evidence to match the story. The timeline keeps changing to match the evidence. And MGM Resorts has tipped its hand too far and exposed its own machinations behind the scenes to control the Official Narrative. Even the GeezerMedia's (Hollywood) endless repetitions of "authoritative" information and stage managing of witnesses (Jesus Campos, Dr. Phil crisis actor) can't keep the story on the tracks.
Together, what we have here is a perfect storm of insider wars with outsider pressure that is blowing the lid off of decades of deceit, fraud, corruption, and abuse that will bring down every single major institution of the oligarchy. A couple of unwinding threats could be caught and resewn, but the tapestry of lies is positively disintegrating and all the repair outlets are under siege.
History buffs will recall the glory days of the Ulysses S. Grant administration, or Warren G. Harding's Teapot Dome scandal. Perhaps you personally recall, as we do, the halcyon days of Richard Nixon's Watergate scandal. What appears to be coming at us is all of these tied together, with a few tons of TNT on top just for good measure.
Skeletons have piled up in America's closet since at least the days of FDR. Kennedy found a few and was about to clean house when he was "warned" off (as was his brother and son). The seams are bursting, though, and there are few, if any, forces on Earth that can contain the imminent bursting forth.
The American population won't obligingly turn its head anymore. The GeezerMedia is eating itself alive trying to stay afloat. The political class is bailing out trying to put some distance between themselves and the coming explosion. This one is gonna be huge.
When this dam breaks, there won't be a dry face or place on Earth. That's how deep the corruption is. Imagine a massive boil on the butt of the Universe that, once lanced, blows forth an endless stream of pus. That's what's coming.
Aware folks are advised to hunker down for the fun.
Here Thar Be Monsters!
From the other side of the argument to the other side of the planet, read in over 149 countries and 17 languages. We bring you news and opinion with an IndoTex® flavor. Be sure to check out the Home Site. Send thoughts and comments to bernard atradiofarside.com, and tell all your friends. Note comments on this site are moderated to remove spam. Sampai jumpa, y'all.
Showing posts with label Hollywood. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Hollywood. Show all posts
25.10.17
14.10.17
The Hollywood Happy Hi-Howdy
One of the most alarming features of the Bumbledick Left is that it requires absolute conformity, a philosophical analogy to lock-stepping military parades. Once conformity takes over any group of people, it becomes susceptible to charismatic leaders, who despite any good intentions, always get corrupted by the perception of power.
Individuals gain power over groups by offering something that the group desires more than any other thing. Wealth, fame, eternal redemption - these are strong motivators for many people. When a leader promises to fulfill these desires, and is perceived to be successful at doing it, the people invest tremendous amounts of trust and authority in the leader in the hopes of attaining their ultimate dreams.
Once a leader has hundreds, thousands, even millions of people willing to do pretty much anything they are told, the temptation for the leader to fulfill his or her own desires is overwhelming. When followers literally throw themselves at a leader, willing to do anything to obtain their desires, who among us could resist the temptation? I aver that exactly none of us could.
Throughout history, people can, will and have surrendered even their most strongly held moral and ethical limits to obtain their deepest desires. Literature is full of great novels and biographies of just such people. Great films, like Treasure of the Sierra Madre, dramatize the effects of moral degradation on the souls in the face of wish fulfillment.
And speaking of great films, that brings us to the topic of today's screed.
If you've been keeping up with the tattler sheets (a,k,a. the news) or @RadioFarSide's tweets, then you know that Hollywood's soft underbelly is being exposed at a rather alarming rate, precipitated by accusations against Uber-Producer Harvey Weinstein.
Many don't realize it, but the entertainment industry has been known for its "loose" ways for centuries. In the ancient Greek and Roman theater, women were not allowed to perform, as it was seen as degrading to the Feminine Ideal. The European castrati are legendary as replacements for female opera performers. Victorian England held female performers at a level just slightly above outright harlot. And none of this is to say that the males were viewed much (if any) better.
Mae West made a name and a fortune playing on the "fallen star" image. Madeline Khan mocked the image with great hilarity in Blazing Saddles. Victor/Victoria was a comedic treatment of the lengths to which female performers would go to achieve stardom. In fact, the entire long tradition of drag queens is an extension of the use of males to perform female parts, since women were castigated for even wishing to enter the second oldest profession.
Grace Kelly's aristocratic family were aghast at her choice to enter the acting profession. Of course, all was forgiven when Prince Rainier offered to make an "honest" woman of her.
All of this is to say that anyone who is shocked by revelations of Hollywood improprieties is either ignorant of history or very naive.
Hollywood has, for nearly a century, offered the lure of great fame and fortune. This dangling carrot has lured millions of aspiring performers from around the world to a single city in the Western United States that rather pompously calls itself the Dream Factory.
This powerful siren song of fame makes anyone in a leadership position in Hollywood almost by default a predator. Not that they have to work very hard, because there are plenty of folks who willingly throw themselves at anyone offering the Golden Carrot of fame. In fact, as I watch the unfolding mess, my first thought is that Harvey Weinstein did something to unleash the wrath of the Hollywood Inner Sanctum. None of this would be coming out if it weren't first ordained and sanctioned by the Inner Sanctum.
Ask Randy Quaid.
Individuals gain power over groups by offering something that the group desires more than any other thing. Wealth, fame, eternal redemption - these are strong motivators for many people. When a leader promises to fulfill these desires, and is perceived to be successful at doing it, the people invest tremendous amounts of trust and authority in the leader in the hopes of attaining their ultimate dreams.
Once a leader has hundreds, thousands, even millions of people willing to do pretty much anything they are told, the temptation for the leader to fulfill his or her own desires is overwhelming. When followers literally throw themselves at a leader, willing to do anything to obtain their desires, who among us could resist the temptation? I aver that exactly none of us could.
Throughout history, people can, will and have surrendered even their most strongly held moral and ethical limits to obtain their deepest desires. Literature is full of great novels and biographies of just such people. Great films, like Treasure of the Sierra Madre, dramatize the effects of moral degradation on the souls in the face of wish fulfillment.
And speaking of great films, that brings us to the topic of today's screed.
If you've been keeping up with the tattler sheets (a,k,a. the news) or @RadioFarSide's tweets, then you know that Hollywood's soft underbelly is being exposed at a rather alarming rate, precipitated by accusations against Uber-Producer Harvey Weinstein.
Many don't realize it, but the entertainment industry has been known for its "loose" ways for centuries. In the ancient Greek and Roman theater, women were not allowed to perform, as it was seen as degrading to the Feminine Ideal. The European castrati are legendary as replacements for female opera performers. Victorian England held female performers at a level just slightly above outright harlot. And none of this is to say that the males were viewed much (if any) better.
Mae West made a name and a fortune playing on the "fallen star" image. Madeline Khan mocked the image with great hilarity in Blazing Saddles. Victor/Victoria was a comedic treatment of the lengths to which female performers would go to achieve stardom. In fact, the entire long tradition of drag queens is an extension of the use of males to perform female parts, since women were castigated for even wishing to enter the second oldest profession.
Grace Kelly's aristocratic family were aghast at her choice to enter the acting profession. Of course, all was forgiven when Prince Rainier offered to make an "honest" woman of her.
All of this is to say that anyone who is shocked by revelations of Hollywood improprieties is either ignorant of history or very naive.
Hollywood has, for nearly a century, offered the lure of great fame and fortune. This dangling carrot has lured millions of aspiring performers from around the world to a single city in the Western United States that rather pompously calls itself the Dream Factory.
This powerful siren song of fame makes anyone in a leadership position in Hollywood almost by default a predator. Not that they have to work very hard, because there are plenty of folks who willingly throw themselves at anyone offering the Golden Carrot of fame. In fact, as I watch the unfolding mess, my first thought is that Harvey Weinstein did something to unleash the wrath of the Hollywood Inner Sanctum. None of this would be coming out if it weren't first ordained and sanctioned by the Inner Sanctum.
Ask Randy Quaid.
Labels:
Bumbledicks,
Harvey Weinstein,
Hollywood,
hypocrisy,
mafia,
Sex Scandal
19.1.17
Snidely Whiplash And The Pissers
Well, here we are on the threshold of history. It is rare when one can anticipate such dramatic leaps in the historical timeline down to the very minute, but the inauguration of Donald J. Trump as the 45th president of the US is certainly one of them.
In one sense, it reminds me of the Apollo 11 Moon landing, when a great swath of the world's population knew in advance the precise moment when history would change. In fact, many would witness the event on TeeVee, just as many presumably will do with the inauguration.
Despite the overwhelming curiosity I feel regarding the exact nature of how Trump will affect history, there is little doubt in my mind that we have arrived at a nexus of timelines, where the path forward is obscured by millions of voices clammoring to predict either magnificent or horrific outcomes from this point on.
For myself, I have not yet decided whether Trump is friend or foe. I admit that I deeply desire this moment to be when the wave of history crests and the inexorable backlash begins against a truly detestable group of humans who have worked tirelessly for the past century to steer the globe towards mass slavery and subjugation.
But I just can't shake this nagging feeling that the whole thing is a set-up, an "op". My spidey-sense is tingling as I construct multiple plausible scenarios whereby Trump or those around him are setting a massive trap for humanity. I can distinctly see how all of this could be an enormous scheme to shut down the freedom movement once and for all.
As I've said more times than I care to enumerate, I am a contrarian. When I see masses of people running in one direction, I figure the best course is to go the opposite way. I would normally consider myself a fool for doing this, except that it has worked far more times than not. In fact, I am often rewarded for this conscious choice by being at the head of the line when the masses end up coming back my way.
In my analysis, I begin with the premise that Trump is a "false messiah.' I assume that he, or those around him, have pushed him to the front as the sugar that draws the ants. What worries me is that the classic ant trap usually involves mixing the sugar with boric acid, which is obviously lethal to the poor creatures who fell for the ruse.
Here's one part of the trap:
We know, because they have revealed themselves quite clearly, that the Corporate Media collude both among themselves and with the Deep State. This collusion is used to steer mass sentiments and popular culture at a very subtle level. Having worked many years in mass media, I am well aware of this fact and have spent many years trying to warn people.
Using the principles of Edward Bernays and reverse psychology, suppose you wanted to steer your political opponents into a trap. The first thing you would do is find a charismatic leader who spouts all the right phrases (which you collected from social media) and then do everything you can to demonize him EXCEPT cut off his media exposure. Doesn't it strike you as odd that Ron Paul was made practically invisible by the media, but Trump received the equivalent of millions of dollars of free air time just to ridicule him? Both candidates were appealing to the same demographics.
Therein lies my first clue. Ron Paul showed that there was a large and powerful movement among the masses who were ready to toss the entire elite class out of power. He was rendered invisible in order to prevent the movement from getting out of hand.
Donald Trump appealed to the same groups, but he is a multi-billionaire media personality who is arguably a major insider, just from his social circles and business connections.
Ron Paul was a true outsider and uncontrollable. Donald Trump is a true insider POSITIONED to look like an outsider in order to redirect the anti-elite movement and ultimately disable it. In essence, Trump is the Pied-Piper of Hameln. Frankly, I cannot imagine a scenario where the Corporate Media would implode the way they have unless it was absolutely necessary to complete the image that Trump is an outsider, thus ensuring all the "rats" followed the magic flute.
Imagine you are one of the Bilderberg/Davos tea-sippers. You have a problem, in that the masses are getting restless and want to lamppost you and your family next Bastille Day. You need to quell the revolution while at the same time getting everyone to buy into your evil plan to rule the world, and none of the masses can be aware that you did this or the spell won't work and they'll be even more angry.
Ron Paul was scary because he was a rationalist. He could present clear, well-reasoned arguments why the US federal government and all its tentacles needed to be unwound. You could make him vanish by simply not looking at him, but the masses who follow him are not going to go away that easily.
You find a popular demagogue with a wildly popular TeeVee show. He has a massive ego, so even if he isn't aware he is being used, he own narcissism will blind him to your machinations. In other words, he will believe his own bullshit.
You have to be sure the right crowds will follow him, so you implode your broadcast media operations, have your various thought-leading celebrities break down in public, and you trot out the heads of your surveillance operations to ridicule and threaten the demagogue.
This convinces everyone that the demagogue is a true outsider, even when all his political appointments are deep insiders from banking and corporate interests, including nominating the CEO of one of the largest corporations in the world to be the third in line to the throne.
Can you see how well this operation is working?
Just to be sure, keep threatening the legitimacy of the demagogue by claiming the election was rigged, or he engaged in perverted sexual practices, or various insiders like the CIA want to kill him. Hell, fire the head of the Washington, DC National Guard at the moment the demagogue takes office, just to make the rubes sweat a bit. Classic cliff-hanger stuff made in Hollywood.
To complete the scheme, the demagogue needs to believe what he is saying and doing. I think Trump believes in himself with complete conviction, but his ego allows him to be rather easily steered in whatever direction the elites need him to go. If Trump didn't believe it, then the insincerity would show up somewhere in his character or speech. The bait must be absolutely convincing to keep the rubes on track.
I want to believe Trump is real and that all of the bread and circuses represent real events, but I can't. I am so profoundly aware at how good Hollywood and the Corporate Media are at manipulating hearts and minds that I automatically assume that anything coming out of those institutions is complete horse shit and designed to the letter to ensnare and enslave the masses.
I do not know, at this point, whether Trump is in on it or not. Nor do I pretend to know what the final act will be. I can imagine a great many climactic scenarios, such as Trump being made a martyr in a very public way (like JFK or 9/11) in order to take control of people's psyches and emotions. I can image scenarios in which Trump, and thus "his" movement, are thoroughly humiliated and denounced, causing people to flee any association with "freedom" and "liberty" and "nationalism."
Whatever the outcome will be, the plan is already in motion, so the aware mind will slowly be able to see patterns emerging. I also figure nothing will happen at the inauguration. The threats are all just part of the elites eliciting the "danger" response, so people will flock to Trump's side to protect him.
I look for the coup de gras to occur within a year, much like 9/11 did with G. W. Shrub. Hopefully by then, we will be able to discern what the trap is and recognize it when it comes.
Whatever the case may be, I will reserve my enthusiastic applause for 2020 or 2024, when the history is written and we can begin the assessment. Until then, I am holding my breath waiting for the other shoe to drop.
I always begin my analysis with two assumptions: 1) everyone acts out of self-interest at some level, and 2) Hollywood and the Corporate Media have turned bullshit into a Fine Art of Manipulation. On these bases, I build worst-case scenarios, and thus I am rarely disappointed and, alas, often right about the state of current events.
No matter how much one likes and/or supports Trump, one must be prepared to accept that we are all being massively deceived - always a safe assumption.
In the end, Hope is not a solid foundation for rational thought.
In one sense, it reminds me of the Apollo 11 Moon landing, when a great swath of the world's population knew in advance the precise moment when history would change. In fact, many would witness the event on TeeVee, just as many presumably will do with the inauguration.
Despite the overwhelming curiosity I feel regarding the exact nature of how Trump will affect history, there is little doubt in my mind that we have arrived at a nexus of timelines, where the path forward is obscured by millions of voices clammoring to predict either magnificent or horrific outcomes from this point on.
For myself, I have not yet decided whether Trump is friend or foe. I admit that I deeply desire this moment to be when the wave of history crests and the inexorable backlash begins against a truly detestable group of humans who have worked tirelessly for the past century to steer the globe towards mass slavery and subjugation.
But I just can't shake this nagging feeling that the whole thing is a set-up, an "op". My spidey-sense is tingling as I construct multiple plausible scenarios whereby Trump or those around him are setting a massive trap for humanity. I can distinctly see how all of this could be an enormous scheme to shut down the freedom movement once and for all.
As I've said more times than I care to enumerate, I am a contrarian. When I see masses of people running in one direction, I figure the best course is to go the opposite way. I would normally consider myself a fool for doing this, except that it has worked far more times than not. In fact, I am often rewarded for this conscious choice by being at the head of the line when the masses end up coming back my way.
In my analysis, I begin with the premise that Trump is a "false messiah.' I assume that he, or those around him, have pushed him to the front as the sugar that draws the ants. What worries me is that the classic ant trap usually involves mixing the sugar with boric acid, which is obviously lethal to the poor creatures who fell for the ruse.
Here's one part of the trap:
We know, because they have revealed themselves quite clearly, that the Corporate Media collude both among themselves and with the Deep State. This collusion is used to steer mass sentiments and popular culture at a very subtle level. Having worked many years in mass media, I am well aware of this fact and have spent many years trying to warn people.
Using the principles of Edward Bernays and reverse psychology, suppose you wanted to steer your political opponents into a trap. The first thing you would do is find a charismatic leader who spouts all the right phrases (which you collected from social media) and then do everything you can to demonize him EXCEPT cut off his media exposure. Doesn't it strike you as odd that Ron Paul was made practically invisible by the media, but Trump received the equivalent of millions of dollars of free air time just to ridicule him? Both candidates were appealing to the same demographics.
Therein lies my first clue. Ron Paul showed that there was a large and powerful movement among the masses who were ready to toss the entire elite class out of power. He was rendered invisible in order to prevent the movement from getting out of hand.
Donald Trump appealed to the same groups, but he is a multi-billionaire media personality who is arguably a major insider, just from his social circles and business connections.
Ron Paul was a true outsider and uncontrollable. Donald Trump is a true insider POSITIONED to look like an outsider in order to redirect the anti-elite movement and ultimately disable it. In essence, Trump is the Pied-Piper of Hameln. Frankly, I cannot imagine a scenario where the Corporate Media would implode the way they have unless it was absolutely necessary to complete the image that Trump is an outsider, thus ensuring all the "rats" followed the magic flute.
Imagine you are one of the Bilderberg/Davos tea-sippers. You have a problem, in that the masses are getting restless and want to lamppost you and your family next Bastille Day. You need to quell the revolution while at the same time getting everyone to buy into your evil plan to rule the world, and none of the masses can be aware that you did this or the spell won't work and they'll be even more angry.
Ron Paul was scary because he was a rationalist. He could present clear, well-reasoned arguments why the US federal government and all its tentacles needed to be unwound. You could make him vanish by simply not looking at him, but the masses who follow him are not going to go away that easily.
You find a popular demagogue with a wildly popular TeeVee show. He has a massive ego, so even if he isn't aware he is being used, he own narcissism will blind him to your machinations. In other words, he will believe his own bullshit.
You have to be sure the right crowds will follow him, so you implode your broadcast media operations, have your various thought-leading celebrities break down in public, and you trot out the heads of your surveillance operations to ridicule and threaten the demagogue.
This convinces everyone that the demagogue is a true outsider, even when all his political appointments are deep insiders from banking and corporate interests, including nominating the CEO of one of the largest corporations in the world to be the third in line to the throne.
Can you see how well this operation is working?
Just to be sure, keep threatening the legitimacy of the demagogue by claiming the election was rigged, or he engaged in perverted sexual practices, or various insiders like the CIA want to kill him. Hell, fire the head of the Washington, DC National Guard at the moment the demagogue takes office, just to make the rubes sweat a bit. Classic cliff-hanger stuff made in Hollywood.
To complete the scheme, the demagogue needs to believe what he is saying and doing. I think Trump believes in himself with complete conviction, but his ego allows him to be rather easily steered in whatever direction the elites need him to go. If Trump didn't believe it, then the insincerity would show up somewhere in his character or speech. The bait must be absolutely convincing to keep the rubes on track.
I want to believe Trump is real and that all of the bread and circuses represent real events, but I can't. I am so profoundly aware at how good Hollywood and the Corporate Media are at manipulating hearts and minds that I automatically assume that anything coming out of those institutions is complete horse shit and designed to the letter to ensnare and enslave the masses.
I do not know, at this point, whether Trump is in on it or not. Nor do I pretend to know what the final act will be. I can imagine a great many climactic scenarios, such as Trump being made a martyr in a very public way (like JFK or 9/11) in order to take control of people's psyches and emotions. I can image scenarios in which Trump, and thus "his" movement, are thoroughly humiliated and denounced, causing people to flee any association with "freedom" and "liberty" and "nationalism."
Whatever the outcome will be, the plan is already in motion, so the aware mind will slowly be able to see patterns emerging. I also figure nothing will happen at the inauguration. The threats are all just part of the elites eliciting the "danger" response, so people will flock to Trump's side to protect him.
I look for the coup de gras to occur within a year, much like 9/11 did with G. W. Shrub. Hopefully by then, we will be able to discern what the trap is and recognize it when it comes.
Whatever the case may be, I will reserve my enthusiastic applause for 2020 or 2024, when the history is written and we can begin the assessment. Until then, I am holding my breath waiting for the other shoe to drop.
I always begin my analysis with two assumptions: 1) everyone acts out of self-interest at some level, and 2) Hollywood and the Corporate Media have turned bullshit into a Fine Art of Manipulation. On these bases, I build worst-case scenarios, and thus I am rarely disappointed and, alas, often right about the state of current events.
No matter how much one likes and/or supports Trump, one must be prepared to accept that we are all being massively deceived - always a safe assumption.
In the end, Hope is not a solid foundation for rational thought.
Labels:
deception,
Donald Trump,
Hollywood,
inauguration,
media,
psy-ops
8.9.16
Inconceivable!
READER NOTE: Don't forget to take the Far Side 2016 Presidential Poll!
The first rule of covert operations, once referred to as "false flag" attacks back when flags were a thing, is that one must create a plausible enemy.
One of the best dramatizations of covert operations I've ever found is The Princess Bride. Follow me here, I know it's not what you expected.
The evil Prince Humperdinck of Florin wants to attack Guilder, a neighboring country, for economic benefits. He hatches a plot to have his wildly popular bride-to-be kidnapped and specific clues left to point the finger at Guilder operatives. The plan goes awry when the anti-hero, a man dressed in black and wearing a mask called Dread Pirate Roberts, intervenes to save the future princess bride.
This brilliant and humorous film subtly shows how possible it is to create an enemy, blame it for everything wrong in your own country, and have your best-laid plans shot out from under you by someone who, on the surface, looks like a bad guy.
It also shows how comedy is often one of the best ways to deliver serious messages in a non-threatening manner.
Speaking of comedy, let's turn our attention to the US, shall we?
For months now, the US media and the Democratic Party - which includes its titular head Barack Obama - have done everything in their power to vilify the Russians, and especially Vladimir Putin. The Russians have been blames for everything from economic collapse to low-flush toilets. The US has in effect poked Russia with sharp sticks, and then runs to mommy when the bear growls. Even Hillarys clear and blatant vote-rigging in the primary elections has been blamed on nefarious Russian agents.
The truth is that the US tried to collapse the Russian economy. The US tried to shoot Putin out of the air. And the US tried to drive Putin to ruin. Why those crafty Democrats have even tried to tell us that the Russians were massing for an attack on NATO.
There is only one reason for this unbridled effort to demonize the Russians: they are to be used as a scapegoat for something big. We can only guess at the scope and nature of the plan, but the obvious part is that the Russian are being played for Guilder, and one suspects that Trump is the Dread Pirate Roberts, the vilified masked party-crasher.
The only things missing are the shrieking eels.
Don't get me wrong here - the Republicans are not innocents, they have their own plan that looks something like The Hunt for Red October. But it's the Democratic Party's Princess Bride scenario that is front-and-center at the moment.
And yes, there's a reason I often use movie plots to explain current events. The way I see it, Hollywood is the US version of a war college, where various scenarios are literally played out as a form of entertainment, both to soften the public mind by planting memes, and the other to see to which plots the public will take most kindly. Most major studio movies are behavioral modification efforts that teach audiences how to act, what to believe and what to expect. If we judge by the most prominent themes in movies, we are in for dystopian societies, apocalyptic wars and marauding aliens.
If you ever want to know what the US is planning, just watch movies.
The first rule of covert operations, once referred to as "false flag" attacks back when flags were a thing, is that one must create a plausible enemy.
One of the best dramatizations of covert operations I've ever found is The Princess Bride. Follow me here, I know it's not what you expected.
The evil Prince Humperdinck of Florin wants to attack Guilder, a neighboring country, for economic benefits. He hatches a plot to have his wildly popular bride-to-be kidnapped and specific clues left to point the finger at Guilder operatives. The plan goes awry when the anti-hero, a man dressed in black and wearing a mask called Dread Pirate Roberts, intervenes to save the future princess bride.
This brilliant and humorous film subtly shows how possible it is to create an enemy, blame it for everything wrong in your own country, and have your best-laid plans shot out from under you by someone who, on the surface, looks like a bad guy.
It also shows how comedy is often one of the best ways to deliver serious messages in a non-threatening manner.
Speaking of comedy, let's turn our attention to the US, shall we?
For months now, the US media and the Democratic Party - which includes its titular head Barack Obama - have done everything in their power to vilify the Russians, and especially Vladimir Putin. The Russians have been blames for everything from economic collapse to low-flush toilets. The US has in effect poked Russia with sharp sticks, and then runs to mommy when the bear growls. Even Hillarys clear and blatant vote-rigging in the primary elections has been blamed on nefarious Russian agents.
The truth is that the US tried to collapse the Russian economy. The US tried to shoot Putin out of the air. And the US tried to drive Putin to ruin. Why those crafty Democrats have even tried to tell us that the Russians were massing for an attack on NATO.
There is only one reason for this unbridled effort to demonize the Russians: they are to be used as a scapegoat for something big. We can only guess at the scope and nature of the plan, but the obvious part is that the Russian are being played for Guilder, and one suspects that Trump is the Dread Pirate Roberts, the vilified masked party-crasher.
The only things missing are the shrieking eels.
Don't get me wrong here - the Republicans are not innocents, they have their own plan that looks something like The Hunt for Red October. But it's the Democratic Party's Princess Bride scenario that is front-and-center at the moment.
And yes, there's a reason I often use movie plots to explain current events. The way I see it, Hollywood is the US version of a war college, where various scenarios are literally played out as a form of entertainment, both to soften the public mind by planting memes, and the other to see to which plots the public will take most kindly. Most major studio movies are behavioral modification efforts that teach audiences how to act, what to believe and what to expect. If we judge by the most prominent themes in movies, we are in for dystopian societies, apocalyptic wars and marauding aliens.
If you ever want to know what the US is planning, just watch movies.
Labels:
Democratic Party,
Hollywood,
NATO,
Russia,
The Princess Bride,
Vladimir Putin
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)



